Tom Ford S/S 2015 London | Page 5 | the Fashion Spot

Tom Ford S/S 2015 London

So was I with the no one gets laid in Dior comment. :rofl:

It didn't seem that way. It was actually supported by your prior argument in defense of this collection.

If it were sarcasm, then you actually do believe that women get laid in Dior and Jil Sander as much as they do in Tom Ford?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
it's interesting that the people who like this collection are somewhat divided along gender lines: by my quick count, 12 hommes liked it compared to 5 femmes.

This goes hand-in-hand with what I've always believed: that probably the biggest fans of Tom Ford are either men (gay or not) or women who like seeing themselves through the eyes of men. Designs that objectify the wearer.
 
I expect to be wow'ed by a Tom Ford collection. This one does leave me wow'ed but certainly not in the way I want to be :doh:
 
I think the most offensive outfit in this whole collection is the one Tom's wearing himself. Mom-jeans cut for man's body, with a matching denim shirt? Doesn't he have a kid now?
 
Sexy sexy. Definitely see some of his vintage collections from Gucci referenced. There are a lot of sexy gowns and corset tops. While I don't like everything in this collection, I do enjoy a lot. Expect to see this collection EVERYWHERE though. Celebrities are going to EAT this collection UP. I can picture it now: Kim, Kendall and Beyonce wearing pieces from this collection.
 
Tom Ford made the mistake of not designing womenswear for six years and therefore lost touch with reality. It's like he thinks he can revive his glory days but it simply isn't working. Women live in 2014 where there is a completely different minimalist approach to fashion and a single soul can't change that. He doesn't even have his powerful friends to push the Tom Ford aesthetic again so I don't see the point in doing this to be completely honest.

POW. This is exactly it. Tom Ford is completely out of touch from his "comeback" collection 'til now. My issue with Tom is that he thinks his vision of what is "sexy" still sells in the way it did during his glory days. It hasn't dawned on him that the definition of "sexy" has changed dramatically since he bounced from Gucci.

He needs to sit back, see his acupuncturist, meditate, go on a cleanse and talk to other women besides the ones who are still missing his Gucci days. Those women are too old to be wearing what they wore during the Gucci era now, and the new generation don't want to wear that sh*t.
 
^ Is it really that out of touch though? I mean considering what is allowed as far as sexy goes these days -- thanks in no small part to famous names like Rihanna, Gaga, Miley and Bey who have made near nudity seem so commonplace that everyday girls and women are adopting it -- is this really so far off the mark? Or is this brash, vulgar, hyper-sexualized look so on the mark as far as the zeitgeist in concerned that it's not even registering?

I mean let's be real, even though girls who live, breathe and die for FASHION with a capital F have embraced the icy cool, look but don't touch faux-intellectualism or the tough as nails, I'll f***ing cut you if you blink the wrong way aggressive thing, micro-minis, cleavage and heels are no less relevant or sexy than they've always been. In fact I'd venture a guess that, outside of the limited milieu that is fashion, many of the looks in this collection would probably register as more sexy to many women than anything seen on a Proenza/Celine/Prada catwalk.

It may not be considered as COOL as it once was to be overtly sexy, but cool can be so terribly overrated sometimes.
 
^ Is it really that out of touch though? I mean considering what is allowed as far as sexy goes these days -- thanks in no small part to famous names like Rihanna, Gaga, Miley and Bey who have made near nudity seem so commonplace that everyday girls and women are adopting it -- is this really so far off the mark? Or is this brash, vulgar, hyper-sexualized look so on the mark as far as the zeitgeist in concerned that it's not even registering?

I mean let's be real, even though girls who live, breathe and die for FASHION with a capital F have embraced the icy cool, look but don't touch faux-intellectualism or the tough as nails, I'll f***ing cut you if you blink the wrong way aggressive thing, micro-minis, cleavage and heels are no less relevant or sexy than they've always been. In fact I'd venture a guess that, outside of the limited milieu that is fashion, many of the looks in this collection would probably register as more sexy to many women than anything seen on a Proenza/Celine/Prada catwalk.

It may not be considered as COOL as it once was to be overtly sexy, but cool can be so terribly overrated sometimes.

I had to sit and marinate on what you've said here and think about what is the disconnect btwn myself and the Tom Ford of today. I have his brick of a book and I started to go through it again to help me articulate this. But let start with this: sex will always sell. I guess my issue with this is the type of sex, and from my perspective, even though he sexified everything he's done, his past work had the sense of eroticism and sensuality that's missing in his work today. That being said, you're right about him being on the mark. Sex has become OPENLY brash and vulgar due to various reasons, therefore making it cheap.

With the free p*rn sites, the free hookup sites and apps, sex is easier to find than ever before. On top of that, no one has the attention span to seduce anyone anymore. It goes from hello, to, "got some naked pics" in a short amount of time. So, yes, I agree that women would most likely pick this collection over Celine or Proenza if we're talking about overt sexuality here. It just seems like such a departure from Tom Ford because to me, he was the epitome of "high class sex". It's purely a subjective and bias reaction as I personally prefer "high class sex" over "cheap sex", but maybe Tom is just reflecting our numb and jaded attitude towards sex and sexuality these days.
 
^ Oh I totally agree with you there educo. This isn't the same brand of sexuality that made him famous at all. It's apples and oranges, really. But I think you're definitely on to something looking at the type of sex appeal he -- and other designers/photographers/stylists -- used to trade in vs. the type of sex appeal he's using here. It's blunt, direct and lacking in tact. So yeah, it registers as blatantly about sex, and that's not going to appeal to everyone, but for better or worse it does seem to be in tune with the world around it.

One thing I don't think anyone can take away from Ford is that he was, and in many ways still is, very good at absorbing what's going on around him and reflecting it through clothing and marketing. The mid-90s presented a sort of androgynous, tough on the outside but hedonistic on the inside version of female sexuality in a post-AIDS crisis world. You had to get through the hardened, jaded exterior to find the eroticism beneath. Now, like you said, that sort of seductive, psychological sex appeal doesn't seem to have a place in our culture.
 
^ Oh I totally agree with you there educo. This isn't the same brand of sexuality that made him famous at all. It's apples and oranges, really. But I think you're definitely on to something looking at the type of sex appeal he -- and other designers/photographers/stylists -- used to trade in vs. the type of sex appeal he's using here. It's blunt, direct and lacking in tact. So yeah, it registers as blatantly about sex, and that's not going to appeal to everyone, but for better or worse it does seem to be in tune with the world around it.

One thing I don't think anyone can take away from Ford is that he was, and in many ways still is, very good at absorbing what's going on around him and reflecting it through clothing and marketing. The mid-90s presented a sort of androgynous, tough on the outside but hedonistic on the inside version of female sexuality in a post-AIDS crisis world. You had to get through the hardened, jaded exterior to find the eroticism beneath. Now, like you said, that sort of seductive, psychological sex appeal doesn't seem to have a place in our culture.

Absolutely. Tom is VERY good at "societal osmosis". That's part of his mysterious charm. He has that animal instinct in detecting subtle changes in the air. People have become more careless about sex now that medicine has caught up with the dangers that happened in the 80s/90s. Not that the danger isn't there anymore, but hookup culture is very free wheeling these days. Which, makes me wonder if the prevalence of 70s influenced fashion has to do with this "free love" attitude. EXCEPT, it's not "love" anymore because peeps know and accept that they don't love each other.

Tom, even if I don't like it, is holding up a very accurate mirror to society. I think the only person who has maintained a certain level of sensuality and eroticism found in "high class" sex is Carine Roitfeld.
 
Last edited by a moderator:


SPRING 2015 WOMENSWEAR INSPIRATION
Designing a collection can be an interesting process. I generally begin by looking at the previous season that I designed and then reacting to it. If one has been in an exuberant mood then it is only natural to often react to that with a collection that might be slightly pulled back and vice versa. So was the case when I began to work on the Spring Summer Women’s Ready to Wear collection that I showed two weeks ago in London. After a somewhat pared back Autumn Winter collection I was ready for something more flamboyant. The same swings in mood can also generally be felt by my customer. If her look has been restrained for a few seasons she will most likely be ready for something more daring.

My earliest inspiration for the collection came this season when I was watching [for about the 20th time] the film "Mata Hari" starring Greta Garbo from 1931 [view clip]. Her costumes are spectacular in the film and to be honest, steal the show a bit for me. Miss Garbo’s clothes were designed by a man who in my mind was the greatest of all of the costume designers working in Hollywood in the 1930’s, Adrian. I have actually been referred to in the past by several journalists as being the “Adrian” of contemporary fashion designers, and while I certainly don’t think of myself in this way it is a very flattering comparison for me. Once inspired by Mata Hari, the image boards in my office quickly filled with photographs from the film, images of Greta Garbo, and images of the real life Mata Hari who was by the way a highly intelligent and modern woman for her time.

Once on the path of glamour and provocation it did not take me long to be reminded of my longtime fascination of the photos of Carlo Mollino as they were staring at me from the walls of my study at home in London. I was also reminded of their power while viewing a show of the work of Mollino by my close friend Tim Jeffries at Hamilton’s Gallery. While some might call Mollino’s photos soft p*rn, what has always fascinated me about them is their reliance, and in fact fixation on the tension of fashion and sexuality. Fashion is adornment of the body, and being one who has always found the human body beautiful and something that should be accentuated and glorified by fashion this was an easy point of inspiration for me to take when I was feeling a strong pull towards the types of provocative clothes that first helped me become well known as a designer in the 1990’s. Sitting next to Victoria Beckham one night at a dinner party and doing something that we never do [which was talking about fashion], Victoria happened to mention to me that her favorite pair of pants were still a pair that I designed in bronze lurex for Gucci in 1996. She also suggested that the time was right for me to look at my own work from the late 1990’s for inspiration. The next day at the office I did just that. And began to layer those images onto a board that was now covered in Mollino photos and Mata Hari images. In the end other inspiration images from films by Rainer Werner Fassbinder and images of Ursula Andress’s breasts from the opening sequence of “The Tenth Victim”, a film that I sponsored the restoration of while at Gucci, also made it onto my wall and played a role in the definition of the mood of the collection [view clip]. One reviewer cited Helmut Newton and the film "Night Porter" with Charlotte Rampling as possible inspiration and indeed they were right as well, as Helmut’s images as well as almost every image of the actress Charlotte Rampling that has ever been captured are burned into my hard drive and have become part of my ethos of contemporary beauty.

Months go by when working on a collection and often inspiration shifts and takes turns as time alters one’s eye. In my case my direction can take 180-degree turns as happened while working on the shoes for the show. For the past 5 years, I have designed almost exclusively non-platform shoes, as they simply felt newer than platforms. Oddly, in much of the market constant customer requests for platforms have continued, as women have hated to give up the height bestowed upon them courtesy of a platform. This season, a high and chunky wedge platform felt right as it seemed time to me for more visual “weight” on the foot.

Final touches to the collection came over the summer, and one of these was a visit with me in Santa Fe by one of my closest friends, long time muse, and collaborator and one who does not shy away from personal style; Lisa Eisner. Lisa arrived at our house in New Mexico literally covered in pieces from her new jewelry collection. I was awe struck by their beauty and immediately asked her to do the jewelry for the show which resulted in two gold dresses designed specifically to showcase her designs and in one case I asked her to create a metal spiked bustier which was for me a reference to the bra turned weapon in “The Tenth Victim”.

Happily most of my reviews were extremely positive although one journalist, whom I happen to have great respect for, called the evening clothes in my collection that covered the breasts with small areas of beading “silly”. I actually was amused by this and immediately sent her a note telling her that I enjoyed her review, which I did. The reference to “pasties” was deliberate and while this reference can be related back directly to Mollino, it was also meant to be a reference to a contemporary fashion that seems to be gaining a bit of ground with very young women who have the bodies to pull it off and that is actual pasties as in the case of Miley Cyrus or even a dress that leaves nothing at all to the imagination as worn by Rihanna to the CFDA awards in New York this past summer. I was at the CFDA awards as I was receiving a “Lifetime Achievement Award” [which I prefer to think of as a “Mid Life Achievement Award”], and I have to say that Rihanna was for me, that night, one of the most beautiful women that I have ever beheld. I had designed several things for her specifically for that evening which she did not wear, but when I saw her it did not matter. I whispered into her ear that she was right not to have worn one of my dresses that night because she looked more beautiful than I have ever seen her look. She was stunning. As Richard said plainly after the evening, “If you are as beautiful as Rihanna, you almost owe it to the world to appear in public almost nude” and I have to say that I wholeheartedly concur.

Tom Ford.
London, October 2014

tomford.com
 
the fact that, among others, he was inspired by one of the most stylistically perfect films ever (the tenth victim) to make this mess is almost insulting lol (but i see it)
 
I loved this Diana Ross YSL collection so much! So iconic!
 
Sorry to revive this but this is maybe my favorite collection of him since he came back to womenswear. It is maybe his most controversial collection yet but the clothes were just great (best trousers of the season). His most directional collection yet and maybe his biggest risk since he came back.

The louche allure, the luxe materials, everything exagerrated. A collection that grows on you.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
214,474
Messages
15,263,101
Members
88,496
Latest member
factorbp
Back
Top