caroulemapoule
Active Member
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2007
- Messages
- 2,963
- Reaction score
- 0
I got these:
topshop.com
topshop.com
I know! I remember the window was really cool, it had a mannequin covered in cuddly toys
And I cannot STAND the moss collections. Give me a label, I'd at least have the dignity to turn up and create it. OR, better still, give a label to someone who has worked their **** off at college and can do something fantastic.
They're everywhere here, my friend got them last week for £30 in the sale.does anyone know if the larissa shoes are still in stores? (the heels with the three velcro straps and platform)
they only have patent black on the site, i want the one with the pink bit around the edge!

I knew it was big but my god I was in there for about 2 hours or something just looking around.
All I ended up buying was some tights and I ended up ripping them last night anyways. 
you have to be there early in the morning.They're everywhere here, my friend got them last week for £30 in the sale.![]()

Yeh, I don't think it is a fur. Also, I am not totally certain but I think they might have used sheepskin before. Anyway, like honeycombchild said, its the same as leather really. I guess if you really object to it, the only real course of action is to organise a boycot of some kind. Anhow, that is indeed one ugly, and overpriced, coatI'm not sure if Sheepskin is classed as a fur if I'm being totally honest. No doubt it's produced as a bi-product of the animal being killed for the meat, and is used as leather would be. I can't say for sure, but I'm pretty certain it's not a "fur".
I agree, I honestly can't see what the difference is between sheepskin and leather...I'm not sure if Sheepskin is classed as a fur if I'm being totally honest. No doubt it's produced as a bi-product of the animal being killed for the meat, and is used as leather would be. I can't say for sure, but I'm pretty certain it's not a "fur".

