UK Vogue December 2008 : Kate Moss by Nick Knight

Just went back and looked at all the pics again and I absolutely cant wait to get my hands on this issue.

Thank you so very much for all the scans Skywire!!!
 
I appreciate the effort UK Vogue have put into their December issue, although the fashion content doesn't appeal to me on a personal level (it all looks like those 'whimsy' editorials you get in Vogue Italia every issue).

But it's a real attempt at bringing us something different, and I haven't even started reading the articles - at 410 pgs, there's more to this magazine than those editorials.
 
The cover is really pretty and FINALLY!! NO MORE PINK FONT!!

But Kate?? Lily?? Karen?? They're in the magazine ever single month!!
Can't they get some new models?
90% of their models are British.

I'm getting sick of it :(
 
The cover is striking, but please, please, please, no more Kate Moss covers!

Using Kate Moss again - because of the way she's lying down, some people wouldn't 100% know it was her on this cover until they were close enough to read the writing stating so.

We know because we saw her name in the thread title, so we didn't have to think twice when we saw the cover scan.

But to the uninformed eye, looking at the real thing in a store, a lot of people wouldn't immediately know it was Kate. It's not a high-impact cover making full use of her image - and they've had to put her name in large black lettering to reinforce the idea that it's KATE MOSS which you shouldn't need to do, not when you have Kate Moss on your cover.

So it's strange to use a well-known model to sell your issue, but in a pose that means she's not that recognisable when you walk into the store and see masses of magazine covers in front of you. Why is she there, when there's plenty of stuff inside to use?

As an aside, the first thing I noticed about my subscription copy is the paper quality of the fold-out and back cover, it's heavy and granular, unpleasantly so, it drags on the fingertips like high-class sandpaper. It doesn't feel cheap - quite the opposite - but it doesn't feel nice.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
WOW. i can't wait to get my hands on this issue! thanks so much for all the scans!!!
 
Can someone tell us what the Lagerfeld feature is about?? and is the Fairy tale feature any good?? thanks!
 
OMG, all the eds in this issue are gorgeous. I will def. buy this.
 
Here's a mention of some of the articles in this 410 pg issue.

4 pg look at 'fantasy' pictures from Vogue's archives, ranging from illustrations of fairies in 1939 to Marsha Hunt's giant afro of '69. Plus some Tim Walker images. All pictures are quite small.

3 pg feature on 'Miss V' which is Vogue's attempt at a JT Leroy-type persona, and no less irritating for being unreal.

2 pg of actresses and designers talking about their most treasured item.

3 pg feature where people customise a fan, including David Downton and Christopher Kane. The results are so disappointing you wish they'd given the task to their kids, who would have been messily and merrily inventive at it.

8 pg section where four writers each tell 2 pg 'fashion fairytales' about a mermaid wanting to wear shoes, a Nigerian magazine in trouble, a cursed bracelet, and Julette Greco's black dress. Short and sweet, I wish there was more space for concise fiction like this in women's magazines.

2 pg article where designer (now researcher) Helen Storey talks about using science in fashion.

3 pg of 'dream walls' where creatives list their inspirations.

3 pg memoir of the passionate relationship between Rana Kabbani and poet Mahmoud Darwish. A momentary antidote to all the frou-frou in this issue.

2 pg article where the owner of 'The White Company' desccribes her quest for domestic perfection.

3 pg feature where Sarah Harris wears haute couture as part of daily life.

10 pg fashion illustration editorial by Karl Lagerfeld - it's OK but I wish a proper illustrator had done it, not a man who dashes stuff off because he has six full-time careers to attend to. Sometimes his photographic/art output suffers from him doing so many things at once, because it can lack vibrancy.

6 pg jewellery editorial with paper cut-out backgrounds by artist Su Blackwell.

The Nick Knight editorial - the problem with showing so many amazing pieces together is that they all start to meld into a continuous stream of outlandishness, because they lack the counterpoint of being contrasted with more ordinary clothing.

The Tim Walker edit makes me smile, but it also means I'm treated to more of Sophie Dahl's writing. The girl can string a sentence together, and thanks to her surname, she's got the opportunities and is making the most of them. But that doesn't mean she can write in a way that keeps your attention on the page. It reminds me that being a good writer takes a lot more skill (and experience) than you imagine, and she's still got to work her way towards that point.

4 pg interview with set designer Shona Heath, who sounds like an all-round nice person.

4 pg feature about garden designer Sarah Price.

4 pg interview with director Dawn Shadforth, who has overseen a lot of the most iconic music videos in recent times, and is now moving into feature films. Again, sounds like a great woman.

6 pg series of floral portraits by David Bailey.

The beauty section opens with a focus on club make-up infiltrating high-street cosmetic ranges.

To be honest, I was a bit underwhelmed with the depth of the content, the sight of all the mad dresses distracts you from under-par quality of some of the rest of the content.

AND in the editor's letter, Shulman herself acknowledges the idea that it's 'Kate Moss again' and said that her original plans were for Kate to feature inside, but when they started shooting, the picture of her in the Dior dress seemed to make for a perfect cover.
 
Kate looks a lot as Brigitte Bardot on that pix. And IMO, she's looks more like Brigitte Bardot than Claudia Scheiffer.
 
thank you so much for the review, tigerrouge:flower:

AND in the editor's letter, Shulman herself acknowledges the idea that it's 'Kate Moss again' and said that her original plans were for Kate to feature inside, but when they started shooting, the picture of her in the Dior dress seemed to make for a perfect cover.

oh God! it can't be!!!:lol::lol::lol:
 
I forgot to mention - the supplement is a 66 pg address book of suppliers throughout the UK and Ireland, florists, cafes, shoe repairs, that sort of rather useful thing. However, there's no fashion content in it. There's a jewellery promotion for Van Cleef & Arpels with a redhead model in the middle of the supplement, but that's just advertising.

Essentially, the supplement is a glorified series of listings, but it gives you ideas for new places/shops to check out, and kudos to UK Vogue for including addresses throughout the British Isles, making it more relevant to anyone who receives it, from London to Dublin.
 
I do find that I'm judging UK Vogue more harshly these days, thanks to the reinvigorated designs of both UK Elle and Bazaar, but if there's one thing they've done well in recent years, it's give a window of expression to Tim Walker.

I don't like every editorial that he's done, but there are some images that have been outstanding - and it also seems that he's generous enough to give credit to the people and the hard work that happens behind-the-scenes to make it all come together. He's not a prima donna, instead he states there's a community of creatives making the vision happen.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think this is the most beautiful cover of the year... it's december... it catches the celebratory feel of the season... its gorgeous.. !! (Now vogue US... this is how you do it!!)
 
^let's hope US Vogue do the same thing to close this year,shall we?...that actually..almost... [fill in the blank]

:innocent::innocent:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The cover is really pretty and FINALLY!! NO MORE PINK FONT!!

But Kate?? Lily?? Karen?? They're in the magazine ever single month!!
Can't they get some new models?
90% of their models are British.

I'm getting sick of it :(

Why shouldn't they use British models? They are the British Vogue, after all. They support all things British - that's the core of the magazine.

I don't wish for the models to be changed, but I do wish British Vogue would leave these awful 80's editorials to other magazines. I hate their usual "neon background, a young model wearing loads of Balmain and Gucci"-kind of editorials. They are disappointingly uninteresting. I think they should focus on editorials with a real setting. That's their weakest point in creating images right now.

Tigerrouge, thank you once again for the review, it gives a good overall look on the issue. I think that I am now more excited about this than I was.

It sort of bugs me though that this issue will soon be in stores here... I am not in a Christmas mood yet, so I am not sure if I want to read a December issue in early November. Is there loads of Christmas-themed talk/images there? I hope not.

As for the supplement... I haven't got a clear idea of what it exactly is about, could someone tell me a bit more about it? Although, perhaps I shouldn't ask since my copy of the magazine won't include the supplement anyway.
 
This issue is insanely good!!!! I love all the content and the fantasy aesthetic. It should be like this EVERY issue!!!

:innocent:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
213,040
Messages
15,206,824
Members
87,004
Latest member
EvaSophia
Back
Top