UK Vogue February 2018 : Margot Robbie & Nicole Kidman by Juergen Teller

[Zorka]

Cont.



UK Vogue Digital Edition

 

[Zorka]

NEW ORDER
Photographer: Craig McDean
Stylist: Kate Phelan
Hair: Akki Shirakawa
Make-Up: Mark Carrasquillo
Models: Yoon Young Bae, Selena Forrest, Hiandra Martinez, Sasha Pivovarova, Fran Summers & Kiki Willems



UK Vogue Digital Edition

 

[Zorka]

Cont.



UK Vogue Digital Edition

 

[Zorka]

RADICAL CHIC
Photographer: Josh Olins
Stylist: Clare Richardson
Hair: Shon
Make-Up: Marla Belt
Models: Kris Grikaite, Ansley Gulielmi, Aaliyah Hydes, Sophie Koella, Blésnya Minher, Lulu Tenney & Sara Grace Wallerstedt



UK Vogue Digital Edition

 

[Zorka]

REMEMBERING ALAÏA
Photographer: Josh Olins
Stylist: Josh Olins
Model/Designer: Naomi Campbell & Azzedine Alaia



UK Vogue Digital Edition

 

[Zorka]

BULLION AIRS
Photographer: Chris Colls
Stylist: Carol Woolton
Hair: Yumi Nakada-Dingle
Make-Up: Laura Dominique
Models: Danielle Lashley, Naomi Chin Wing & Emily Unkles



UK Vogue Digital Edition

 

[Lola701]

I wonder how Edward feels about the more than mixed reactions he got from this...

 

[kokobombon]

Too bad that we´ve got this cover/edit because the rest of the issue is really good imo.

 

[Melancholybaby]

I wonder how Edward feels about the more than mixed reactions he got from this...

Probably deleting all the comments on his instagram as we speak.

 

[kikifoz]

RADICAL CHIC
Photographer: Josh Olins
Stylist: Clare Richardson
Hair: Shon
Make-Up: Marla Belt
Models: Kris Grikaite, Ansley Gulielmi, Aaliyah Hydes, Sophie Koella, Blésnya Minher, Lulu Tenney & Sara Grace Wallerstedt


UK Vogue Digital Edition

Curious if there will be backlash bc there are white girls featured in a Black Panthers themed shoot.. or if bc Edward approved it's okay.

 

[Benn98]

Can I just add, when you look at the content on these pages (thanks for posting, Z ) is it really that markedly different from Alexandra's Vogue?

 

[kikifoz]

Can I just add, when you look at the content on these pages (thanks for posting, Z ) is it really that markedly different from Alexandra's Vogue?

Completely agree. Aside from Juergen, it's Craig + Kate Phelan and Josh +Clare. Why not bring in his W favorites like Emma Summerton, Jamie Hawkesworth... Hell, i'd even take a Steven Klein story just to so that it feels different from the previous leadership.

 

[anlabe32]

Nothing new but I do enjoy the McDean and Olins editorials.

Kiki looks spectacular.

 

[Deleted member 141523]

I trust in you Edward! You can do it

 

[Benn98]

I bet Edward can't wait for this issue to be off the shelves. It's just one PR disaster after another for them.

British Vogue advert for fur trade causes confusion over magazine’s stance under new editor

The full-page advert appears in the February issue

Olivia Petter
Thursday 11 January 2018 08:21 GMT

The relationship between fur and fashion has always been a tempestuous one.

With several major labels now boycotting the use of fur in their designs entirely, British Vogue’s decision to take advertising from the International Fur Federation (IFF) may come as a surprise.

A full-page ad for Wearefur.com appears in the February issue of the magazine in a prominent position alongside the title’s masthead.

Gucci and Michael Kors are just two of the high-profile brands to stop using fur in their products.

Speaking at the London College of Fashion, Gucci CEO Marco Bizzarri revealed that the label would be going fur-free in 2018.

“Technology is now available that means you don't need to use fur. The alternatives are luxurious. There is just no need," he told Vogue at the time.

Meanwhile, one of the most recent blogs on the IFF’s website condemns this decision in a post entitled: “Does Gucci really want to choke the world with plastic fur?”

The ad features three models, each posing in opulent fur items of clothing. According to the site, animal welfare is a “top priority” for the IFF, who claim that the fur sector respects the legal and ethical rights of animals.

“Anti-fur groups do not want to hear this message,” they write.

“Many anti-fur campaigns and campaigners are not about improving welfare but simply the abolition of the fur trade on ideological grounds.

“Most anti-fur myths that are regularly circulated are easily debunked.”

However, according to PETA, there are a myriad of ways in which fur production goes against animal rights.

For example, they claim that animals are often electrocuted by fur manufacturers to limit damage to their fur. The only US state in which this process is currently illegal is New York.

Meanwhile, in China more than two million cats and thousands of dogs are hanged or skinned alive for their fur.

Plus, they state that one third of all fur sold in the US comes from animals who have been killed in steel-jaw traps which slowly suffocate the animal.

It was widely known that fur products were not to be promoted in editorial content under Alexandra Shulman’s reign; speaking to The Guardian in 2009, Shulman revealed that British Vogue "broadly speaking" doesn't feature fur.

While the advert might have led some to believe that Vogue's policy has changed since new editor Edward Enninful joined, a spokesperson for the magazine confirmed this is not the case.

"Vogue’s policy has not changed," they said.

"From an advertising perspective, it has always been the commercial policy to accept fur advertisements as long as they strictly respect British and European Union legislation. Vogue may make reference to fur editorially as a trend if it is being featured on the catwalk."

Source: Independent.co.uk

 

[MON]

Does he actually oversee every aspect of this magazine? I mean, this may not be as much of a big deal, but if this happened to Anna, she would have been dragged

 

[Benn98]

Does he actually oversee every aspect of this magazine? I mean, this may not be as much of a big deal, but if this happened to Anna, she would have been dragged

He'd have seen the ad in the magazine mock-up, I'm sure.

 

[MON]

^I also do agree that there’s not much difference between his Vogue and Alex’s. The editorials are the same, however edward’s has this filter that makes it a bit toned down and perfect for an indie magazine. But aesthetically, they’re the same. Alex trumps him art direction wise.

Can’t believe Johan Svensson oversees this magazine as well. He was the one responsible for the most beautiful art direction for VP to date.. and yet there’s this. The inside pages are tragic. Cover text is tragic.

 

[tigerrouge]

As a UK Vogue subscriber, they keep sending me email surveys about certain ads in the issues - did I see them, what did I think etc – so they are working to develop commercial relationships with new companies and industries. The inclusion of this ad won’t have been an oversight, it'll be part of a bigger plan.

I didn’t notice the ad because I haven’t bothered unbagging my subscription copy yet. They didn’t send it to me until several days after it was sitting on the newsstand, so it can’t be that important that I read the content.

Well, I haven’t properly read ANY of the first three issues, although that does mean I can sit down with them as a series, and get a feel for where the magazine is going. As it stands, I wouldn’t resubscribe, but I think you need to give any new editor at least six months to settle down.

 

[kasper!]

Reference of the cover....from ingo nahrwold's insta