Anna Wintour needs to retire asap
Maybe because we want mature style from Vogue, because IS Vogue. They used to have their magazine for teens, but vanished in this CN cutting madness. Loyal readers of Vogue from years and years, with good taste, don't see what they want here. They don't recognize Vogue. I read @justaguy and @vogue28 and they always have the best word/opinion here. I trust more in them than some guy that bought Vogue once or twice in their life or want Vogue to reflect the hype of today no matter if it left fashion behind. If you want to reflect the people of today and you're making a fashion magazine, stick with fashion. Don't forget your identity. Anyway, I hope Olivia gets a better cover story the next time.I don't get why her age or young look is such a big deal. She is 20 and the ed couldn't be any more inoffensive.
I hate how infantile the whole thing is. The styling is abysmal.
The choice of Olivia Rodrigo is slightly weird, seeing as this album is only her sophomore one and despite the success of her "Sour", she is not quite as critically acclaimed as the other musicians who have been on Vogue's cover before.
Not sure if you haven't noticed already but Anna and conde don't give a flying f*ck.Loyal readers of Vogue from years and years, with good taste, don't see what they want here. They don't recognize Vogue
I still don't get why you have an issue with her age. If they featured a 15 year old girl but styled her to look like a 30 it would be fine for you?Maybe because we want mature style from Vogue, because IS Vogue.
She is 20 but styled as a 15 year. It's so hard for you or Blueorchid to understand? I'm trying so hard to say it. I always thought and I don't remember If I said it here time ago, that I think a fashion magazine oriented to adult women from the day one is not good for under age girls because they have a different body, a different mind, and are so sensitive about the impact of image and self esteem. Maybe you're trying to say time changes because magazines are more open to show bodies from any type. If that's your word, well, I agree with you that now Vogue has less negative impact in teens as it had decades ago with the imposition to be thin and blonde and they are a positive influence in very young girls. But well, I don't care to see a girl with 20 year portrayed as a kid in a magazine oriented for adults. Also I don't care the Political Correction Police here (we know who they are, I saw their names all the time in the likes) and social media with their impositions and I say whatever I want in the way I can. I won't change my mind after this at all. If you want to cancel me, go ahead. I'm so stupid and evil, I deserve your hate.Not sure if you haven't noticed already but Anna and conde don't give a flying f*ck.
I still don't get why you have an issue with her age. If they featured a 15 year old girl but styled her to look like a 30 it would be fine for you?
this is terrible, and a real waste of a cover star who actually has a strong sense of personal style+ capacity to be interesting in photographs, not to mention is popular among Gen Z - and this bullsh*t is the result? What is up with US Vogue's covers? I thought the Jung Hoyeon one last February was bad but this is a close second.
the entire cover+shoot feels so lazy, like a girl blogger in the 00s could take better photographs than these with a self-timer on a Nikon D90 and put together better outfits too.