LOL! Could easily double as a US Bazaar cover story circa 2007, photographed by Terry Richardson.
I bet Kathy Hilton resent the fact that she didn't have the Kris Jenner foresight to capitalise on her daughter's infamy at the time and push herself into the limelight. You can tell by the heavy 'cool mon' energy she's emitting in this campaign that she desperately wants a slice of the fame.
with paris alone, at least you could expect a little irony in the whole cheapness. but they indeed got the decade wrong, none of this is fun anymore and who on earth would like to associate with nicky hilton? she's the epitome of emptiness and arrogance to me.
Of all the luxury brands to work with the Hiltons, I certainly did not expect it to be Valentino.
I don't know how I feel about this. On one hand I kind of love the cheesy early 2000s vibes I'm getting from this, on the other hand this concept is so out of line for the brand. It's like they didn't even want to go for a high fashion approach.
So weird and confusing, I already mentioned how much I dislike this bag in Zendaya's campaign and this is only making me dislike it even more.
Was it on purpose that both the Rosebud and Roman Stud have double entendres for names? Now that I think of it, It would have been wonderful if instead of these three washed up hags we had a hunky roman stud holding the bag half nude. As for the rosebud...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.