Vogue Australia June 2016 : Kim Kardashian by Lachlan Bailey

[AL92]

source: news.com.au​

 

[TeeVanity]

Wow her 2nd Australian Vogue cover and she looks stunning on it.

 

[Idyll]

Honestly, I think this is the best she's ever looked. I'm partial to more natural looks (and that is clearly not Kim's thing) so perhaps I'm biased, but she just looks gorgeous here.

 

[Benn98]

Wow, a repeat for Kim?? But why?! Maybe Christine campaigned for this, but I'm quite prepared to accept that her last cover might've sold well. I don't like the image even though I'm an ardent Bailey fan. There's something off here, she looks very gaunt around the neck area which makes her head look big.

I am however rather keen on their new art direction. This style was very popular for fashion titles from 1990-2000. But I don't think readers responded really well to it even then, so I'm not sure if it will continue to work for Vogue Australia. The premise of minimal coverlines in general seems to be that either the image is powerful enough to warrant a purchase, or the brand is terribly established with a solid following. As it is the 3 names/features mentioned on this cover is absolutely vomitory!

 

[Nomar]

This magazine really has gone down the drain.

 

[MON]

She looks gorgeous. One of the best I've seen of her.

The new layout and font.. Why??

 

[SpeakThatJDunn]

Don't like it. The layout is hideous.

 

[RanThe]

Eh, magazines always want to do a stripped and undone Kim, when Kim doesn't like Kim anymore.

I'll wait to make my final opinion when I see the editorial. Kim doesn't bring anything new to the table. I rather see Margot Robbie get the cover since she's from AUS and has two new movies coming out.

 

[VogueDisciple93]

Absolutely horrific layout.

 

[guimon]

She looks flawless. I like it.

 

[AL92]

source: news.com.au​

 

[AL92]

source: news.com.au​

 

[Deleted member 45369]

The new font and layout has a 90's Bazaar vibe to it aside from that I have nothing else nice to say.

 

[AL92]

​

 

[TaylorBinque]

I much as I despite a Kardashian, I think she looks beautiful here and I like that it fits their aesthetic. I think if they are going to talk about fashion disruption and Balmain, she seems like a nice buzzy subject. And at least Vogue AUS has a nice balance of good choices of models and celebs.

 

[phungnam96]

Look like they're trying to copy Vogue Paris under Fabien's era lol

 

[Nymphaea]

I'm really into this cover, just like the last Vogue Netherlands nice white colours and Kim is rather digestable in this way.

 

[Bertrando3]

Are you kidding me??? It looks PLAIN UGLY! The cropping is hideous, the layout is AWFUL and she is back on the cover because?? And people keep worshipping pff... Vogue Australia let me down.

 

[narcyza]

Maybe it's better chocie than Kandall for a Vogue cover. It's not so bad I was sure it will be look much worse.

 

[sixtdaily]

Are you kidding me??? It looks PLAIN UGLY! The cropping is hideous, the layout is AWFUL and she is back on the cover because?? And people keep worshipping pff... Vogue Australia let me down.

I think this is an important point. What does the Kardashian family do besides visiting their plastic surgeon every month?
I really don't understand why a (once?) respected fashion institution like Vogue would want to be associated with the Kardashians who are just the most tasteless, superficial and vain people to ever walk this planet.