Although they’re more or less a more commercial but lesser version of Mert & Marcus/I&V/Bruce Weber
I agree somewhat, but also M&M and I&V in their beginnings were not that great and polished, but very creative indeed. S&S had a great start, without even looking up anything I can clearly remember their images with Anna Ewers + her wet saliva lips, Stoya naked for POP and Lana with the bee on her lip. I do disagree that they are not creative enough, but I would rather say they just hit the wrong vibe and the wrong time. There is no theatrics and energy that is Carlijn, Roe, Johnny Dufort and whatever else.
Their style is very calculated and very low-energy, it is very clinical. I wouldn't compared them to Bruce, but M&M is clearly there. To me it reads more like a M&M with a hint of Wolfgang Tillmans or Juergen even in there with the intentional imperfections. M&M are polished to the brim, S&S have a lot of photoshop, but their composition always has some slight imperfection that I enjoy immensely.
Personally, when they were at their best, all the Juergen/Meisel knock-offs took the wheel (Comte and others above, Weir, Ethridge and so on), and people demanded something raw, energetic, unpolished or very theatrical, the "party pics" era of M&M also hit that wave alongside. So they missed the mark and never really took off huge.
Still a shame. They are commercial, but just a bit artsy enough not to make it boring. Edited and photoshopped, but not just over the edge. Sexy and glamorous, but not in a stale, outdated way, yet still mainstream appeal is there. Well, I am not their agent, so... best of luck to them, but we have enough fresh blood coming in right now.