Women get to have opinions. They get to have opinions you or I might disagree with. They get to be wrong. They get to be uninformed. They get to be arseholes.
But they get to have their voice and not be silenced.
Look back at any important point in women's history, and there's always a social push to silence them. The people who thought women having the vote was 'unnatural' had a lot of support. Those people probably believed themselves to be in the right.
When history gets written, 'the right thing to do' in any particular moment is often not what the masses chose to do at the time.
It's a hard question to answer, because it's hard for people to separate themselves from the constant influence of content that's deliberately designed to mainline into your brain - but if social media didn't tell you what to think and what to say, what would anyone's approach be to any of these topics? Would there be a greater ability to cope with differing opinions?
Because there are nearly six billion people in the world, and all of them have a different opinion on things. Even from a pragmatic viewpoint, it would be easier to develop ways of coping with the reality of people having varied opinions than it is to wage internet war on everyone that's labelled as thinking in the 'wrong' way.