W April 2006 : Jessica Simpson by Michael Thompson

[chicgarcon]

WHY WHY WHY WHY WHY?!

who was in charge of this? I'm writing a letter

 

[testinofan]

So UGLY !!!!

 

[Jennika]

they put britney on the cover, why not jessica

they like these pop-tart covers right after a major breakup (brit post justin, jess post nick)

 

[kimair]

the image...from perezhilton.com

 

[em 692]

i don't know if fierce is a good work to describe her, even if she is "reboron" she'll always be a ditz in my eyes...

 

[Zoolander]

The only reborning she did was some face work including upper lip crap

 

[Zoolander]

Well, hey, isn't this the issue with the Kate Moss/paris/carnival editorial?

 

[masquerade]

great, the last thing i need is her man made boobs in my face. god, they could have done so much, like when britney was on the cover they totally changed her look.

its so boring, and the last thing i want to do is buy the clothes shes wearing, and isnt that the point to begin with

i wonder what the couture thing is

 

[Fabulyss]

Can we please all boycott this issue? Please! Nobody buy this.

 

[Cosette]

great, the last thing i need is her man made boobs in my face. god, they could have done so much, like when britney was on the cover they totally changed her look.

I agree. I mean, despite the fact that I'm really not fond of Jessica Simpson, they at least could have made the cover appealing by doing something crazy and intense with her look and clothes, much like Britney's as you said. But no, instead they only increase her dullness by choosing the frame with her blankest expression, and then call it fierce? Please. This is the worst cover I've seen in a while...

 

[|PerfectTonight|]

They lost my interest when Britney was on the cover!

 

[NOE]

Putting on extensions that look like they came from a horse's mane doesn't justify a 'Brand New Look'.

A new look would have been for her to not pout, and not show off her Christian t*ts.

 

[johnnykenton]

this. . .it's. . .she's. . .dead to me.

i'm over it.

 

[polka_dot]

Sexy and single again, the pop star celebrates her independence again with a brand new look.

I'm sorry? She's just as ugly as before?

 

[KhaoticKharma]

Sexy and single again, the pop star celebrates her independence again with a brand new look.

So...being married to someone is a death sentance now? Because one can't possibly be independant if one is married! How can you be indapendant if you can't sleep with random members of Marron 5, you silly people!

 

[lacy99]

It's a really bad cover. I think they've tried to make her a bit more 'high fashion' with her hair like that, but the clothes are just a let down. She doesn't look very attractive and the pose is all wrong.

 

[Whitelinen]

She's even more disgusting than Paris Hilton. And I'm boycotting.

 

[Jacque Marcel]

God, I wish I can boycott this issue but I have a subsciption. Maybe I'll call them to not even bother sending me this issue.

 

[Deleted member 1957]

dont kill me but i kind of like it. Its unexpected and more high fashion than her usual covers. I guess shes trying to market herself like a tough looking multifaceted business woman which works perfectly with the new image. Only thing i have a problem with however is the pink lipstick am pretty sure that the ed is very cool.

 

[pandinha]

what's that? a penguin? a ball? nooo, it's W going down the hill!