aldn said:I think his namesake label does do a lot of coping but at LV he has a little more progression. At least when you look at the F/W 06 for male. The material and shapes I thought were a new direction.
Right now I see a lot of people going back at the more mainstream labels.
Maybe we see no progression because it is a corporation at the end of the day. He has to bring in the money. And the money is in the retrospective collections he puts out.![]()
We can't count the menswear, he doesnt design it. He just shows up the day of the show, get's a little note card featuring design notes (in case anyone asks), walks out on the runway to take credit.
Of course money is why they're in business. It's strange really. Take Chanel and Louis Vuitton; they both slap thier monogram on everything, they both use celebrities, they both show horrid RTW shows, yet Chanel has more cache in thier little boucle camellia than LV has in thier entire archive. When I walk into LV there are people wandering looking around, planning to buy nothing, when I walk into Chanel there are people wandering looking for something to buy...
How does Chanel cause people to behave in that manner? I dont have the time to get into it now but I will continue this...