BetteT
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2003
- Messages
- 22,819
- Reaction score
- 109
No ... I beleive that there is a practical reason to require a minimum height and it doesn't have much to do with "image".
I'm a stylist and I work with models for photoshoots so I undertand the practicality of being tall. The models are TALL!! A when they have their heels on, they are way over 6 ft. tall ... often about 6'2" to 6' 4". I have to help them get clothes on over thier heads and zip or button them up, maybe fasten a necklace on them ... while protecting their hair from getting mussed up. So, if you are short, your reach just won't be high enough.
I'm almost 5'7" which is taller than average ... and I still wear shoes that give me a height boost for that reason, when I'm working on set.
I'm a stylist and I work with models for photoshoots so I undertand the practicality of being tall. The models are TALL!! A when they have their heels on, they are way over 6 ft. tall ... often about 6'2" to 6' 4". I have to help them get clothes on over thier heads and zip or button them up, maybe fasten a necklace on them ... while protecting their hair from getting mussed up. So, if you are short, your reach just won't be high enough.
I'm almost 5'7" which is taller than average ... and I still wear shoes that give me a height boost for that reason, when I'm working on set.
Last edited by a moderator: