Yay or Nay? (November 2003 - June 2009) | Page 612 | the Fashion Spot

Yay or Nay? (November 2003 - June 2009)

Status
Not open for further replies.
lea definitely nay. the front is not even boring.. its just plain ugly.
hope you get a nicer trench, cause they are awesome!
 
YAY or NAY?
dress
matthew-williamson6.jpg

fashionforbreakfast
 
yay, I like it a lot but I love peacock feathers. unless your tall, I think I may shorten it becuase it's so loose.
 
It's a miserably rainy day here in Houston. So hopefully I can bring some sunshine to others...

That dress in Post #12,227 is kind of like a peacock design. I'm going to Yay! this dress, unless you think this design is terrible. Very managable to me. I'm passing that dress.



Dress confidently and have a great weekend!
 
gossiping...i love it! I saw it on Katy Perry and it's a great look!

blah.jpg

eonline.com
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It looked great and better on Nicky imo. I would wear it. Yay Gossiping! Good luck on trying to get your hands on them when it comes out. I'm still not sure if I'm gonna get it myself though..
 
Last edited by a moderator:
gareth_pugh.jpg


Help!! I am dying literally of want for these shoes.
At the same time, I hesitate with the $1000 price tag. Are they worth it?! I've looked high and low and haven't been able to find anything else that even comes close. I don't see how this is any different from a $1000 pair of CL patent mary janes...

An added bonus is that I'm incredibly short and the 5.5 inch heel is definitely a HUGE plus...

What do you think?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Post #12,234 features some colorblocked open-toe boots. The heels alone are a yay. The open-toe design is a yay. Sadly, there's too much going on for me to recommend them. Colorblocking is no problem, but this is pretty lethargic. These shoes are as beautiful as today's weather here in Houston- miserable. If you're going to spend $1,000 USD on a pair of shoes, look elsewhere. Some Manolos or Louboutins will serve you well for that price or more. Nay! to these.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Kiwanja, I like them. Maybe not the colors but the shape is great. I wouldn't buy them for $1000 though. That's too much for sandals. Only if you make a lot of money.. It's the price tag that makes me say Nay.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
NAY!! i don't care how much you make...1000$ is ridiculous. No pair of shoes are worth that much unless they are made of gold, or something that has value!
 
the gareth pugh wedges are very awesome. If the price is no problem for you (as in you can afford it) then I say yay- they will breath life into any potentially 'ordinary' outfit.

Whether something is a "Manolo" or a "Louboutin," doesn't change the price that you will shell out. If it's your personality, it's the right shoe. The brand doesn't mean anything although it will direct you to the 'style.' I personally will probably never ever have a pair of Manolo's or Louboutins in my shoe-drobe. The styles those brands provide just don't match my personal taste. Except maybe those Louboutins with the python skin that have a corset lace-up effect going on lol.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
gossiping - yay

kiwanja - please provide credits for the image else it will have to be deleted.
I'm with justlooking, personally I find the gareth pugh wedges awesome but get them only if you are comfortable paying retail and it totally suits your style.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
215,501
Messages
15,305,006
Members
89,520
Latest member
retroer
Back
Top