OMIFAN9 said:The Trinity they simply ruled.
texastess said:Yes they did!
Thanks everyone that contributed. I must concede that earlier eras of modeling had better models and covers IMO.
Lana is a doll; Helena is beautiful and Yasmeen is regal.
I also liked Brandi and Beverly.

sepia said:I know I'm late, but I finally made my way through the entire thread. Awesome photos!Thanks everyone that contributed. I must concede that earlier eras of modeling had better models and covers IMO.
Favs: Linda, Christy, NaomiLana is a doll; Helena is beautiful and Yasmeen is regal.
I also liked Brandi and Beverly.
I'm sorry, but I don't see what the big deal was about Claudia. She was trash.![]()
Anyway, carry on!![]()
. Yes way better models & work. Naomi,Christy & Linda reign Supreme once again
! As far as Claudia maybe it's the photos posted, I don't think she is trash-but she was photographed that way some times. I think it looks that way b/c she was big,blond and kinda busty. I will show another side soon. What I think is really trashy if you will are the SI and some VS girls, Sepia how can you ignore the group photos just posted right above your comment
post 1412-13! I think they are way more provocative than photos of Claudia posted.sepia said:It's not that Claudia is so provacative, I just think she's bland and uninteresting. Uninteresting features and pics IMO. She can't hold a candle to the other supers!

! She isn't the greatest but I do dig her.sepia said:I know I'm late, but I finally made my way through the entire thread. Awesome photos!Thanks everyone that contributed. I must concede that earlier eras of modeling had better models and covers IMO.
Favs: Linda, Christy, NaomiLana is a doll; Helena is beautiful and Yasmeen is regal.
I also liked Brandi and Beverly.
I'm sorry, but I don't see what the big deal was about Claudia. She was trash.![]()
Anyway, carry on!![]()