I agree with Lainey. Angelina does indeed look regal. Her beauty is truly of a singular kind, because there really is no precedent for it. Nobody in the public eye has looked like her before she came along, and nobody has since come along to challenge the brand of aesthetic Angelina represents. There are many kinds of beauty; there's the fragile and childlike ilk where the sheer vulnerability of the face renders it hauntingly beautiful; there are very classically beautiful women like Nicole Kidman who're just very obviously beautiful and then there are the imperfect beauties like Kate Moss (in her younger days) and Uma Thurman whose imperfections make them a hell lot more interesting to look at than they would've looked with perfect features. But none of these women possess the raw, dominating and powerful beauty of Angelina. It not only commands your attention, but just won't let you go. In that way, she definitely looks very regal.
However, I haven't always liked her appearances. I think she looks best when she allows her beauty to speak for itself. She really doesn't need to style her hair elaborately or accessorise her look, because sometimes that tantamounts to over-egging the pudding and she ends up looking overwrought. Which is a real pity because she can wash the floor with every other woman without even trying.
...
However, I haven't always liked her appearances. I think she looks best when she allows her beauty to speak for itself. She really doesn't need to style her hair elaborately or accessorise her look, because sometimes that tantamounts to over-egging the pudding and she ends up looking overwrought. Which is a real pity because she can wash the floor with every other woman without even trying.
...
Last edited by a moderator:
) but now I don't see that at all in Angelina, and I haven't for years.
She was a bit of a wild child when she was younger, but I would never call her sl*tty or trashy looking.
