Eimyria said:This is just horrible. It looks like 90's Army Salvation with Urban Outfitters... and Maxim's display looks like a quick grab from Marshall's sale rack thrown together.
. Second, her Chick line is so simple that even those who aren't fashion designers can design the same too
. Third, maybe she had graduated from the Fashion Technology Institute in NY but she seemed not to apply whatever she have learned back in NYC. 
justinleaddict said:TACKY! Some of those women look like they are trying to fit into little girls' clothes from limited too.
I would think she could do a better job than that. I meen, if i had my
own label... yeesh. Don't even want to think about that.![]()
Look at thisbag. Don't know if it was posted yet, but it costs $295 at Kitson.
If I were you I would resist my urge to buy that ugly bag and buy this cheaper (less tacky) Dior bag:![]()
Ianastar said:![]()
We should let this thread die a slow and horrible death, and not give her "line" anymore exposure.
![]()
![]()
This is me, Officially signing out from this thread but for me american people never really did anything for fashion...
Cheap seems to be in the genes.....her dad's company built some townhouses near me that are overpriced and cheaply made.Blanche DuBois said:I never liked her anyway...but this is awful, I mean really...but I have to say, that most of the young americans...i mean middle class or something, do wear unflattering things for their bodies, with all respect, but for me american people never really did anything for fashion...it's hard to walk in any street (except NY maybe) and see someone unique, and who looks good...
about celebrities labels, what about hillary duff line, and the olsen line?? they're also terrible, totally untastefull.
and I do not agree with the "let them dress bad so they can learn" message to teens...you can make clothes that are young and simple, and fun for teens...but this is not an example of course.