Chloé S/S 11 Paris | Page 4 | the Fashion Spot

Chloé S/S 11 Paris

I'm sorry but who is Testino? I thought Ralph Toledano was the CEO who was fired / left because of poor financial performance in his sector?

Also, isn't their cash cow, the perfume these days? What perfume existed under Phoebe and Paulo? I don't remember a 'star fragrance' like the current two.

Sorry im not so meticulous about the names , yes it was Toledano. Chloe always had the original Chloe parfum since 1975 which was discontinued recently . They only have one fragrance thus far , the new one was launched just recently. When I mean cash cow , it means something many people are coveting to buy and sell very well, the fragrance while sells decently but its no cash cow! It isnt a parfum in the same vein as Burberry's or DG's Light blue which sell extremely well.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Chloes parfum has gotten mixed reviews , mostly deeming it too matronly and heavy, Im assuming their new Love Chloe is geared to attract younger consumers.
 
Chloes parfum has gotten mixed reviews , mostly deeming it too matronly and heavy, Im assuming their new Love Chloe is geared to attract younger consumers.


It may have got mixed reviews (most of the less than good ones I've read accuse it of being a bit too light and forgettable, in comparison to the original Karl Lagerfeld Chloe), but it appears to be a love-it or hate-it type of situation, because it sells very well, apparently.

In fact, I read it is/was Saks/NM/BG's (can't remember which?!) best selling fragrance (at one point, anyway)? Also, I believe it is very popular in Asia.

I think Love, Chloe will sell well, too, if due to nothing else but the lovely shaped bottle and the blush coloured juice! Whether it smells any good, or not, I don't know, yet?

I think they should add a purse-friendly version to the Love, Chloe range, too, in the style of the original Chloe's refillable purse spray; especially as the lozenge-shaped bottle would lend itself well to becoming a goldtone flask, without the glass portion (with, perhaps, just a lozenge-shaped porthole, showing the level of the liquid?!).

Personally, I'm sad that they cut-back and then discontinued the original Chloe, as it was a very nice, evocative fragrance (originally in a gorgeous, Calla lily stoppered bottle) and I like vintage perfumes, in the same kind of way I like vintage clothing and accessories.

If Chloe no longer want it, I think Parfums Lagerfeld should pick it up, again and preferably, start selling the perfume version in the original bottle, once again (although, that may be too cost prohibitive, by now, I don't know?).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Wait, so the CEO left because of sh!tty sales? I don't remember hearing about his. I've always thought Chloe sold really well.
 
^ Well, from what I've read, anyway, why he left hasn't been confirmed, but he did leave, yes.
 
^^Yeah, apparently Toledano got fired because of poor sales.

(nypost)
The label's profitability had surged under designer Philo, who was relatively unknown when tapped by Toledano to replace McCartney in 2001. But Philo left abruptly in 2006, citing personal reasons, and business has never fully recovered.
 
I thought the Chloé girl was in her 20s... she's looking 37 this season..
 
This collection is like the other collections in Paris so far - pretty but very safe and forgettable. Someone mentioned prom and I agree... the cream pleated dress (2nd to the last look) screams prom to me. I don't see the sophisticated and elegant Chloe woman that Hannah was describing in the latest commercial.
 
Paulo was definetly better than her , at least his designs were youthful this is soo stark and its trying to hard to be Phoebe's Celine. If Hannahs thinks she can compete with Phoebe Philo , she has another thing coming :innocent:

from the beginning of her tenure, i've resisted any suggestion that hannah macgibbons found herself in any way inferior to her predecessor, paulo melim andersson, because she never ever, unlike andersson, committed that original sin of forgetting about the heritage of the house: with this collection, she committed that very sin. this collection, as so many have mentioned, is a calvin klein collection. it's a good calvin klein collection, but it's not a chloe collection. not by any stripe of the imagination. and this comes at a particularly pressing time as we have entered, seriously, THE PERFECT CHLOE SEASON. marc jacobs is doing that seventies thing. fendi is doing that seventies thing. gucci is doing that seventies thing. why wouldn't the quintessential seventies' girl house not do seventies?!?

this is more than an off collection, this is a missed opportunity. sure, she got boring with her work at chloe, which, in a recession, is forgiveable, but designing for a completely different house? fashion blasphemy.

00050h.jpg
00170h.jpg


style.it
 
Last edited by a moderator:
from the beginning of her tenure, i've resisted any suggestion that hannah macgibbons found herself in any way inferior to her predecessor, paulo melim andersson, because she never ever, unlike andersson, committed that original sin of forgetting about the heritage of the house: with this collection, she committed that very sin. this collection, as so many have mentioned, is a calvin klein collection. it's a good calvin klein collection, but it's not a chloe collection. not by any stripe of the imagination. and this comes at a particularly pressing time as we have entered, seriously, THE PERFECT CHLOE SEASON. marc jacobs is doing that seventies thing. fendi is doing that seventies thing. gucci is doing that seventies thing. why wouldn't the quintessential seventies' girl house not do seventies?!?

this is more than an off collection, this is a missed opportunity. sure, she got boring with her work at chloe, which, in a recession, is forgiveable, but designing for a completely different house? fashion blasphemy.


I liked Calvin better.
 
Setting the clothes themselves aside for the moment, this was the worst runway show I have seen this season - at least Burberry had a certain trainwreck deliciousness about it, but this was just plain bad. The music was incongruent and there was no consistency in the models' walks, which was kinda OK because it kept me awake.

Re the clothes, there were some flat out bad creations and quite a few matronly dresses, but the stuff that I thought was good was more than good, it was great.

Interestingly, for all its flaws, I think this is one of my favorite collections.

Overall I liked the collection but they really don't deserve a pass for the screwed up parts - Chloe is an established house and this looks like a show being put on by a former Project Runway contestant, not even one of the winners or finalists, rather one of the decoys.

I am going to give Hannah an'em another chance, but they really need to get their you-know-what together in more ways than one!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
she needs to bring back all the colors she did in SS09...
ia with "she is forgetting about the heritage of the house" stella and paolo did it better...
 
Let's not get carried away, now - Paulo did not respect the aesthetic of the house, he just tried to make Chloe into another Marni.

I would say this is very disperate - some of it is absolutely awful (dentist's shirt, shorts and a chiffon overskirt, anyone?) and/or completely house-innapropriate; but some of it is fairly good and very (or sufficiently) Chloe-like.

Problem is, the bad drags down the good...

What it's really lacking, though, is any sense of fun, or opulence.

A/W '09 was, by far, her best season, IMHO, as it had a mix of the more Chloe elements here, with more softly opulent pieces.

If that season didn't sell very well, it wasn't for the most part due to the design, IMO, it was due to a combination of the economy and recent Chloe prices, which (on a like-for-like basis) have much more than doubled (and have almost tripled in the UK!), over the last seven, or so, years.

However nice it may be, £410 is a lot of money to pay for a tasselled scarf, when the equivalent would have probably 'only' cost you about £150 five years ago (at the height of Phoebe's powers).
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
215,211
Messages
15,291,183
Members
89,130
Latest member
apadilla
Back
Top