Here's another one from that same set: Italia Vogue 2003
(chloecentral)
I think Chloe is not viewed as relevant is because she doesnt fit into the mainstream. She's not the anorexic girls, the ditzy "dont call me" ditzy blonde popstars or skinny waifish actresses. I like all in some way a little of what these girls (which I know you all know who I'm talking about) sense of style and all..but Chloe doesnt fit what America is selling or buying.
Chloe's style is an acquired taste. You can always count on her to wear something different, off-beat, edgy, ahead of its time, weird, not appropriate, maybe ill-fitting, stylish, sexy or wth was she thinking?..lol And I love that, her sense of style is not boring to me. Whereas so far you can always count on Jennifer Aniston to wear something black , Xtina to wear her signature red lips, or Britney to wear some awful hat or lately no panties..lol
The thing is they all know what looks good on them and what doesnt (because the majority of them have a stylist) Chloe does not (only when she's in magazine editorials etc). So Chloe is like us in that she's on her own, creating her own look, ever-changing, never compromising. She's unpredictable yes but you can also say predictable in that you'll know when you spot a new Chloe sighting or photospread- it'll be something different like you've never seen before and perhaps in many cases more beautiful than before.