so he got rid of the logos (fine)
then he wanted THE classier look (so far so good)
then poor of him, he loses his dear Richardson and the collections suffer (understandable)
then the "it" bags were gone (too bad)
but who ever gave him permission to turn the extraordinary make up he used to have into this boring pale look, and pair it all with a non-stop parade of old rugs and curtains from the fifties? what is this? New-money Prom Dance (Class of 1953) ???
things are going dooooooooooooown (not talking about profit.. about that, i hear they are doing great)
now that he has finally learned how to separate Galliano from Dior, is this really as good as it gets?
i'd rather watch an Oscar de la Renta show
P.S: the only thing that keeps me watching Dior shows, or entering stores is the shoes. I like what I see in these pictues, but if the shoes go wrong too... then it'll be all gone