MissMagAddict
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2005
- Messages
- 26,630
- Reaction score
- 1,309
Failing that, she'll definitely get her 27th US Bazaar cover, wearing a pink dress against a blue sky background.
Like a breath of stale air.
Last edited:
Failing that, she'll definitely get her 27th US Bazaar cover, wearing a pink dress against a blue sky background.
I also think she has little Vogue for the size of her fame as an artist ... Neither the Latin edition (Spain or Mexico) gave her cover. But since it's something beyond my control, I only regret and content myself!I always felt that Wintour's grudge over Lopez was so unecessary! I mean look at some famous women and how many covers they have gotten over the years (not to mention for far less successful projects), and Jennifer only has 2?!?!
I don't listen to her music, or watch that many of her movies (not that into rom coms), but she was always a conmpetent actress, and she was perfection in Hustlers.
And then there is the fact that she photographs like a dream, and is willing to have fun with HF! She would be perfect for the March issue. But in a way i would love to see her get UK Vogue by Meisel instead, coming full circle from that US Vogue/Wintour incident back in the 90s!
December, Gisele Bündchen replaced her.Do we know what month she was suppose to cover in 2001?
but that dress is Balmain Couture Fall 1999this leaked picture looks great.
You're right... I was confused because Gisele was cover in 2001 and 1999.but that dress is Balmain Couture Fall 1999
Lopez only rings once for Vogue
ANNA Wintour shouldn’t hold her breath waiting to get Jennifer Lopez to sit for a Vogue cover again. The diva with the devastating derriere is way too busy to suffer a second shooting. The lovely Latina was scheduled to appear on the cover of the December issue, and took time out from shooting “The Cell,” for three days of posing for Steven Meisel. But when the proofs came back, Wintour wasn’t happy. “Anna killed 80 percent or more of what was assigned,” a Vogue snoop told MSNBC.com gossipeuse Jeannette Walls. “She said ‘This just isn’t me, and this isn’t Vogue.'” The magazine confirmed the cover was nixed, but insists it’s trying to schedule a reshoot. “This happens all the time,” a spy told PAGE SIX. “They shot Gwyneth Paltrow, what, six times, and Winona Ryder more than twice. You could have a shoelace out of place and it would blow a cover. Anna liked everything about Jennifer’s shoot but the cover.” Tough, says Lopez. “It’s unfortunate she spent so much time on it,” her rep told us. “If it were up to her, she’d love to be on the cover, and it may happen sometime next year. But it’s really a matter of fitting it into her schedule. Making movies and music comes before magazine covers.”
Her dancing pictures used in Vanity Fair are more Jennifer style.Oh wow, that picture is such a 180° turn from her image at the time!
Laughed so hard when someone from J.Lo’s team (I think) interrupted Anna and told her that J.Lo was starting to film ANOTHER movie this 1st of October. What a way to flaunt J.Lo’s relevance.
Really don’t see this as anything but a courtesy call with Anna before the show starts.
Although, Versace’s backing might help her chances.
But say what you want, the woman is a professional and super gorgeous (especially when they made her up.)
Also, where are these male magazines preaching inclusivity and yet continue to deny the greatness of Billy Porter?
Also, where are these male magazines preaching inclusivity and yet continue to deny the greatness of Billy Porter?
I actually thought he would get GQ Style for autumn, but that went to Tom Holland. Maybe Welch will shock us all by giving him an OG cover. I mean, I very much doubt we'll see him on Esquire anytime soon. Lol.
Because the media only allows white men being femme.