Dario Vitale - Designer, Creative Director of Versace | Page 46 | the Fashion Spot

Dario Vitale - Designer, Creative Director of Versace

I hated Dario vitale collection horrible but there was something there just not for versace it was too juvenile and his vision is watery not enough interesting clothes to buy. But he does have something very different about him.And he should open his own brand if the critics love it so much.
 
The Capri people are Americans. Prada are Italians. One is a corporate conglomerate, the other is a family owned conglomerate.
2 different cultures and mindset.

Capri made a strategic move to go through the sale. Prada made a petty and strategic move to protect their investment.
Why is it petty? prada took time to decide to buy Versace,we don't know if dario was part of there plan to be creative director at Versace in the first place.

Dario left on his own decision while Prada asked him to stay at this crucial time for the company as Prada knew what they were planning.
Prada is not obligated to disclose this acquisition to Dario who is in a creative department not a ceo or part of the board members etc at Prada.

It's not petty if Prada didn't see him to drive the creative direction on this versace project in the first place, he left on his own personal will to only find out versace has a new owner and they didn't see him to lead the project......could have been any other new owner.

I think nobody in there right mind would keep a person that dumped you when you asked them to stay in life or business.

Its about the principle not likability of the collection.
 

The Brief, Wondrous Appointment of Dario Vitale​

by Lauren Sherman

Over the summer, Miuccia Prada called Capri C.E.O. John Idol, who was in the process of selling Versace to her for $1.4 billion, with a fascinating request. Mrs. Prada, according to sources familiar with the conversation, asked that Dario Vitale, her former longtime acolyte and the new creative director of the brand, not stage a runway show in September.

On some level, the ask was completely understandable. Versace was set for a transformation after the acquisition closed, and who knew what form the new strategy would take. Moreover, nobody knew what to expect from Vitale, who had joined Versace just before the deal with the Prada Group materialized.

At first, the Versace team did the necessary maintenance, and told the press that the show would be reduced to an “intimate presentation.” Then, Versace C.E.O. Emmanuel Gintzburger took a significant, undeniably gutsy risk and let Vitale stage his original vision: a runway debut, which ended up being fully, dramatically staged, taking place in Milan’s oldest museum. At first, it seemed to pay off. The show was mesmerizing—a hit with critics, editors, and buyers alike—and Vitale became an immediate Person of Interest within the fashion community. The advertising campaigns were working, too. Meanwhile, Team Versace pressed on through the fall, waiting patiently for regulatory bodies to allow the deal to close—and to see how Miuccia, who is also a close friend of ousted creative director (and family heir) Donatella Versace, would respond. After all, Vitale’s exit from the Prada Group, where he was mostly recently designing Miu Miu, was fraught. (Prada is a business that prizes loyalty—and that starts at the top.)

Now we know. On Thursday, about 48 hours after the deal officially closed, Prada fired Vitale. Lorenzo Bertelli, the Prada heir and Versace’s new executive chairman, announced his ouster, which was positioned as a mutual parting of ways, in a companywide email.



Fait Accompli​


Vitale, according to people familiar with his thinking, didn’t see it coming. Gintzburger’s team, though, must have known it was a possibility. Succession planning at the brand had been a labored, long-gestating challenge, and the process, which began before Tapestry’s botched acquisition of Capri, was complicated by Versace family politics. Years ago, Riccardo Tisci was meant to join the Versace business—press releases were already written—but things fell apart at the last minute over simple semantics. Donatella was even said to have later become interested in Vitale, but clashed with Gintzburger in other ways. At the same time, her awkward transition from visionary to global brand ambassador did not sit right with her loyal employees.

Alas, this was a doomed situation from the start, and the fact that Vitale’s first collection was so good—magic, even—was essentially beside the point. As with any breakup, the only people who know the truth are the ones at the heart of the matter. It’s just too bad they couldn’t get past their conflict in the name of fashion.

Presumably, this isn’t the last shoe to drop. According to the Bertelli memo, Gintzburger is staying put, at least for now. I gained a new respect for the executive when he pushed forward with Vitale despite being directed to do otherwise, and I could see the Prada Group executive team admiring the chutzpah, even if his choice was immediately reversed. No matter what, though, Versace will be reorganized based on clinical decision-making over the next year.

Of course, everyone is asking who might be up next. There’s always a chance the Prada Group will bring back Donatella in some sort of creative capacity, pairing her with a partner. But I think that’s unlikely. My sense is that they’ll utilize her more fully as a brand ambassador, given all the goodwill she inspires and her massive audience, including 12 million Instagram followers. In Europe, there is speculation around Hedi Slimane, pinned to the ongoing “apartment in Milan” conspiracy theory, but that overlooks simple economics. (I also don’t see a world where Slimane and Raf Simons operate within the same group.)

Pieter Mulier is everyone’s favorite choice in the musical chairs game, always. While he seems more committed than ever to Alaïa, where he just built a new studio, he also has a long history working with Simons, and is capable of really anything, design-wise. (Interestingly, he speaks fondly of early Versace in the new issue of Self Service.) More creative people could come up with more names, but there is also a chance they have not yet hired a new designer, and the quick defenestration was a signal that they are going to completely overhaul the business—and fast.

I’ve never seen something like this happen before, and I am not sure we will again. For now, though, let this be a lesson about the industry and how it might stand 10 years from now. There will be dozens of essays and Instagram posts about the tragedy of Vitale’s exit, citing the lack of patience and foresight among executives. But when it comes down to it, this is an emotional business, and an emotional product: Sometimes it works, and sometimes it doesn’t. But you’ve got to take risks.
Puck
 
Already riddled with mismanagement and miscommunication. You have to ask what the point of it all was. Their fault for making Dario the face of new Versace but also his fault for going with it and not taking a step (or ten) back to understand his position at the house. That’s Prada management for you though. I’m not surprised nor even shocked. It’s just funny that it’s all been allowed to happen.

Simply saying no does a whole wonder of good. But now they have to start over, swipe the socials clean and do another “debut” all over again.
 
Why is it petty? prada took time to decide to buy Versace,we don't know if dario was part of there plan to be creative director at Versace in the first place.

Dario left on his own decision while Prada asked him to stay at this crucial time for the company as Prada knew what they were planning.
Prada is not obligated to disclose this acquisition to Dario who is in a creative department not a ceo or part of the board members etc at Prada.

It's not petty if Prada didn't see him to drive the creative direction on this versace project in the first place, he left on his own personal will to only find out versace has a new owner and they didn't see him to lead the project......could have been any other new owner.

I think nobody in there right mind would keep a person that dumped you when you asked them to stay in life or business.

Its about the principle not likability of the collection.

Re: the principle of them asking him to stay and him leaving - did they really expect him to turn down a creative director role at a globally recognised house and remain an anonymous design director indefinitely? Getting annoyed at him accepting a once-in-a-life opportunity is rather petty, imo.

The only justification I can think of is if they had promised him CD of Miu Miu when Miuccia retires, but even then he is well within his rights to want to branch out from Prada Group - and Versace remains a bigger (if not necessarily better) name than Miu Miu.
 
Already riddled with mismanagement and miscommunication. You have to ask what the point of it all was. Their fault for making Dario the face of new Versace but also his fault for going with it and not taking a step (or ten) back to understand his position at the house. That’s Prada management for you though. I’m not surprised nor even shocked. It’s just funny that it’s all been allowed to happen.

Simply saying no does a whole wonder of good. But now they have to start over, swipe the socials clean and do another “debut” all over again.
i think it was fair for he new owner to ask to not make a new big show to await the officiel take over (to exactly not have a double relaunch) ....the mismangent is on capri side to not honor the request.

image you buy a house and the seller decided to do some changes to the house like a gold pool or whatever lol ...before officiel handover you would be pissed to after you asked no don't do anything further to your new house.
sorry but this falls on capri ...from now anything bad that happens we can blame prada after the official take over.
 
He was doomed before his first awful look walked. If his debut was any good then this would matter. Miu Miu is garbage to me as well so he is 0/2 for me.
 
Re: the principle of them asking him to stay and him leaving - did they really expect him to turn down a creative director role at a globally recognised house and remain an anonymous design director indefinitely? Getting annoyed at him accepting a once-in-a-life opportunity is rather petty, imo.

The only justification I can think of is if they had promised him CD of Miu Miu when Miuccia retires, but even then he is well within his rights to want to branch out from Prada Group - and Versace remains a bigger (if not necessarily better) name than Miu Miu.

what lorenzo or the prada group ceo said then that he left for highly personal reasons ...he made a bet on his future its understandable ....but that's not prada´s responsibility the became again his boss and garety him a future.

sure he with his rights ..prada with their rights ......for me it's case closed situation gamble you win some you lose something.

i do think without disclosing where he was going but saying i got this big opportunity it would be bit different between them.
but funny enough i remember before he officially left there was rumors he was going to versace but not clear as CD or nr 2.
 
I hate how this word is overused to mean sexy now. Probably it's what they mean, work of Donatella in 2000s will be mined and directly pulled, referenced to death most likely... as it was done with TF at Gucci
That's what I liked about him. Regardless of one's thoughts on the collection, he didn't go down the obvious route.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
215,459
Messages
15,303,504
Members
89,465
Latest member
meowmowcatluver
Back
Top