D
Deleted member 7575
Guest
There you go.
Meh, it's only to the 25th.
It's no worse than Comme De Garcons biannual sample sale or the Loro Piana outlet store.
There you go.
it's dreadfull, i am just glad to see Raquel Zimmerman backThere you go.
If you thought Lanvin can't get even messier, you should think again. They have a massive sale of Sialelli's pieces from the archives now and they're up to 80% off. It's like they don't understand the impact of such actions on the image of the brand.
After two years, Charles de Vilmorin and Rochas have parted ways:
Discussion: how many times it will take for Nina Ricci to follow the same path?Discussion: Who should replace him? I'd like to see Claire Wright Keller at the helm.
I think that de Vilmorin had a interesting vision for Rochas and his pre-collections showed an interest in designing clothes, back they didn't seem to have the infrastructure to support it. In truth, Rochas' big f*ck up was closing the fashion division back in 2006. They had a good thing going with Olivier (especially that last collection), but they neglected to consider that a fashion house at that size needs shoes and accessories to support the ready-to-wear/demi-couture.Discussion: how many times it will take for Nina Ricci to follow the same path?
In order for Rochas to really make it, there needs to have a real desire from the executives. A real desire to produce and sell RTW means real investments.
I liked De Villemorin because I thought he had potential but it never took off commercially and the hype died really fast.
Rochas needs someone who will design clothes. Clothes that are meant to be sold and worn. Not Redcarpet / Influencers stuff meant to boost sales of old fragrances.
‘Clare can be great but for a contemporary positioning. Nobody cares for Rochas in the luxury Avenue.
I think that de Vilmorin had a interesting vision for Rochas and his pre-collections showed an interest in designing clothes, back they didn't seem to have the infrastructure to support it. In truth, Rochas' big f*ck up was closing the fashion division back in 2006. They had a good thing going with Olivier (especially that last collection), but they neglected to consider that a fashion house at that size needs shoes and accessories to support the ready-to-wear/demi-couture.
I already know that Nina Ricci is definitely going down that exact same route. While with Rochas, I saw actual care and attention to shape, silhouette and colour, at Nina I don't see anything that could be redeemed and merchandised to an adult consumer and the whole thing was just... odd.
I think that de Vilmorin had a interesting vision for Rochas and his pre-collections showed an interest in designing clothes, back they didn't seem to have the infrastructure to support it. In truth, Rochas' big f*ck up was closing the fashion division back in 2006. They had a good thing going with Olivier (especially that last collection), but they neglected to consider that a fashion house at that size needs shoes and accessories to support the ready-to-wear/demi-couture.
I already know that Nina Ricci is definitely going down that exact same route. While with Rochas, I saw actual care and attention to shape, silhouette and colour, at Nina I don't see anything that could be redeemed and merchandised to an adult consumer and the whole thing was just... odd.
Bruno also left Lanvin…
His menswear also got a lot of attention during his tenure too. That would be a smart move.hope he goes to givenchy, there was just no saving lanvin but i could see his oppulence work in givenchy
Rochas needs to give it up. ATP it seems like money laundering bc what has Rochas ever been in the last 20 years? All they had was that mini run from Theyskens and that was it. That didn't even crossover, it was just a fashion darling.
Cross over to what? A similar place as Balenciaga is holding today?
It's making little sense to compare fashion brands in the early 2000s and holding their 'success' in comparison to where brands are standing a good 20 years later since the market has totally changed. Brands were operating and were distributed much differently. Balenciaga under Nicolas was a niche brand holding in-house shows with stripped-back decorum and barely-existent advertising while today they are doing multimedia runway spectacles and aggressively marketing their content. Clearly when looking at the Theyskens years, one could say this is the best a brand like that could have achieved, given it was owned by a conglomerate who had no wish to operate a fashion brand: Procter & Gamble wanted to rid of the fashion division ASAP when they purchased it in a big package of perfume liscenses from Schwarzkopf, which is how that story ended.
Tom Ford left his own brand with final FW 23 collection