Discussion: Who Should Be The Creative Director of Chanel?

Whispers in Paris, as a buyer told me, is that Hedi remained in the innner circle of the Arnault and he does want DIOR so JW Anderson is poised to replace Ghesquiere at VUITTON
Guys please, of course we like having fun with speculations, but there is no way this is going to happen within the next 5 years.
We just ended 6 months of crazy speculations on the CHANEL creative director, I don't have the strength to handle this anymore LOL
- Maria is not going to leave UNLESS she wants to: Dior RTW is now a powerhouse and her Dior couture is so successful it generates more revenues than Bottega (LOL)
- Hedi is a control freak, hence he will never be able to join a brand in which fashion and makeup are managed through different entities, which means he's excluded from any big brand, including Dior. There is no way Arnault will allow a single person to get creative direction of a WHOLE brand when the different entities are so successful. One thing is starting a Celine beaute line with 2 red lipsticks and some niche perfume, one thing is handling Dior with smash hits perfumes like J'Ador, Sauvage, skincare lines, makeup staples like Dior Addict shine and so on. Also can you imagine Hedi handling perfume and holidays campaign with celebs? Come on now. This is the reason I never believed any speculation on Hedi going to CHANEL.
- Ghesquiere is most likely going to end his career at Vuitton, he's fine designing his scifi 80's inspired collections spending 90% of the year with his partner in LA. Bernard is fine as long as he provides inspirations for new monogram bags release and his collections hold consideration and value between the fashion pack. It's not like Ghesquiere collections are the main source of income for LV anyway.
 
Hedi did perfume and iirc even oversaw skincare at Dior Homme. He would have a field day overseeing all those campaigns. But I do think it's more likely he'll reappear at another relatively small brand with more or less free reign to build it up as he sees fit.

Ghesquiere going to Chanel might be the only scenario where I'd be happy to see him leave LV. It's not happening, but I can dream...
 
Of course not, its craiyon. But I'm here for the bottom row. And th right column. And all of it, really.
 
My two cents on the Blazy's appointment:
- Not my favorite choice: nice designer but not so great as image director, great collections and individual desirable pieces, however his BV never made an impact in terms of image and visuals
- Too much of a quirky intellectual and fake pretentious to handle a signature brand like CHANEL, this kind of creative directors perform better in smaller "niche" brands. No one wants a Raf 2.0 with the designer being burnt out after 2 years...
- CHANEL stuff basically sells itself because of the legacy and the status symbol perception from both general public and fashion savvy. The brand doesn't need avant garde or craftmanship to grow, it needs what has been lacking since Karl's passing:
1- Virality: build Eiffel tower or Spaceship station in Grand Palais to get news and general public talk about the show / collection. Virality helps catering a wider audience
2- Visuals: make your products appealing to both aspirational customers and niche ones. Karl's visuals were a mix of everything: artsy, pop, chic. Blazy's is all about being pretentiously artsy with that kind of humour and wit that is so fakely pretentious and not genuine at all (a la Raf). Examples: releasing underwear intrecciato / trompe l'oeil leather pieces (pants, briefs, jockstraps)
3- Star designer: a fashion institution like CHANEL needs a figure who is engaged in different entertainment fields: Maria got her feminist art group, JWA got his Guadagnino movies. Have anyone ever heard Blazy's speaking? I don't think I have ever seen one single public interview from him. He's too introvert and shy to handle such a brand.

From what CHANEL's currently missing, my choice would have been Sarah Jessica Parker / SPJ. Imagine Jacquemus shows with 100x the budget: instant virality and aspirational customer buying overpriced card holders of timeless classic to be part of the EXCLUSIVE EXTRAORDINARY CHANEL WORLD.
 

puck.news

It’s Happening: Blazy to Chanel
Behind the scenes of new Chanel designer and Lagerfeld heir Matthieu Blazy’s exit from Kering, plus the unexpected leading candidate to replace him.
The wheels are turning at Kering, although perhaps not in the direction that chairman and C.E.O. François-Henri Pinault and his deputy, Francesca Bellettini, had hoped. On December 16, Bottega Veneta creative director Matthieu Blazy—a standout talent in Pinault’s stable—is expected to be named the next creative director of Chanel, a historic appointment that will transform the industry, no matter how it plays out. No word on whether Blazy will design one final Bottega Veneta collection. A spokesperson for Kering did not comment. Nor did a spokesperson for Chanel.
Blazy, a rising star yet to reach his creative peak, was hardly at the top of any expert lists when they were debating who might be in the running to succeed Karl Lagerfeld. And yet, it’s all very real, and indicates, as I’ve said before, that Chanel is changing the way it operates as the Wertheimer family and global C.E.O. Leena Nair attempt to future-proof the business. In the early ’80s, Chanel wrote the modern luxury brand playbook by hiring Lagerfeld, a superstar stylist, designer, and marketer, to remake Chanel into a piece of pop culture. (The luxury pyramid—with couture on top, followed by ready-to-wear, then accessories, then fragrance and beauty—did not exist before Lagerfeld created it at Chanel.) Some four decades later, though, giving one person absolute control over something that has grown so exponentially, into several billion-dollar businesses housed under one roof, no longer makes sense. Blazy, a relatively young talent with a focus on precision and craftsmanship, will steer Chanel’s overall vision, but he will not be responsible for every piece of the puzzle, and there are few designers at his level who would accept that. The Chanel executive team have also made it clear that they would like the next designer to stick around for 10 or 20 more years; few in the running possessed the stamina.

Anyway, we have plenty of time to discuss what this appointment means for Blazy, for Chanel, and for the industry. Today, let’s consider how this all went down behind the scenes at Kering, Bottega Veneta’s parent company.
The Replacements
Despite murmurs otherwise in the Kering offices, I’m told that Blazy’s resignation was definitive… and unexpected. All this would have been highly secretive. Typically, as part of the recruitment process, a prospective designer auditions for months. If Blazy did that, he would have had to make the time and mental space for that creative work on top of designing his most-praised collection to date at Bottega Veneta. (Remember, Simon Porte Jacquemus was said to have hired a team of something like eight people to work on his presentation for the job.)

This would all require an incredible amount of discretion and discipline, which the Wertheimers clearly value. As for whether Kering tempted him to stay, it appears that they probably had no choice but to let him go. There’s a lot of hullabaloo around non-competes in the fashion business, but the reality is that, in Italy, they can be bought out. It would have been more productive to simply wish Blazy the best and find a replacement.

I’m told that several names were bandied about as Kering began interviewing successors—including Jacquemus (poor guy can’t stay out of a creative director conversation) and Miu Miu’s Dario Vitale. However, I’m also told that the leading candidate, and likely appointee, is Louise Trotter, the current designer of Carven. Trotter, who previously worked at Lacoste and Joseph, collaborates closely with the stylist Suzanne Koller, and the Frankie Shop-meets-Old Céline aesthetic of Carven is their mind meld. She’s a grown-up commercial designer and can certainly handle managing a big team. But can she inspire the way Blazy did?

At Bottega Veneta, executives are already feeling melancholy about Blazy’s exit. After all, he is talented and professional, and designs things people want to buy. Bottega is also the only major Kering business that is growing at the moment. Alas, while the conversation over the next few weeks will be focused on Blazy’s exit and Trotter’s prospects, Bellettini and her team face other challenges, too. At Saint Laurent, new C.E.O. Cédric Charbit and creative director Anthony Vaccerello are grappling with the slowdown of that business—an inevitability with any longtime designer (what goes up must come down) but one that needs to be managed.

However, it’s the performance of Gucci, the group’s profit center, that determines how the entire thing runs. There is a hurry-up-and-wait feeling to the Gucci situation that will only be resolved by either a tremendous uptick in sales or a creative change, despite the green shoots as accessories ramp up and fresh ready-to-wear arrives in the stores. The business is significantly smaller than it was two years ago, and while everyone is sort of sick of talking about whether Sabato De Sarno will stay or go, they can’t stop talking about it, either. This is a case where money will fix everything.







 
My prediction is Blazy will be anointed by the fashion world with praise despite Chanel customers feeling very cool towards the news. The Chanel customer will see him for the Emperor in New Clothes that he really is, and it will be an total flop. Like Raf's Dior it will garner general critical acclaim by the press, but the masses won't care for it. It will fly over their heads and they will be happy to go to LVMH.

LVMH is keeping JWA in their back pocket, either Dior or LV mens. I don't think Pharrell is a long-term plan. Hedi and Galliano are also in their back pocket.

I don't think Leena Nair has the fashion instincts for this either. If she picked Blazy, it's because he is nice for HR and suited for 2024, but fashion is ready to swing outside of quiet luxury/intellectualism. The Prada-Raf-Phoebe intellectual triangle that Blazy is at the center of is already so tired.

Also wishing Kering the best of luck
 
Whispers in Paris, as a buyer told me, is that Hedi remained in the innner circle of the Arnault and he does want DIOR so JW Anderson is poised to replace Ghesquiere at VUITTON
WHAT?

I can see him (JWA) at Vuitton but for menswear. Pharell's tenure gives very much interim designer until someone qualified gets approached for it
 
Last edited:
Maria is not going to leave UNLESS she wants to: Dior RTW is now a powerhouse and her Dior couture is so successful it generates more revenues than Bottega (LOL)

Dior Haute Couture generates more than €1.6 billion in sales? Isn't their entire revenue like €8 billion? I highly doubt Couture would make up such a big portion of their annual revenue. Significant, yes, but 20% of annual revenue? Even their RTW makes up a smaller percentage than that.
 
I feel lucky for Matthieu Blazy and wish him all the best.
At the fashion spot forum Blazy us often described as pretentious and over- intellectual....his BV copying Lees BV....lacking vision etc. .

cannot understand this!!!

For me he is the best CD Kering has at the moment. I think he will manage chanel....but i think it will be more commercial then his BV.... so to say " less artsy"


Just hope he does not burn out after two years.....

He seems to be an introvert yes.... nevertheless, he really seems to WANT chanel....so he must taken a clear decision. I trust him...



LOUISE TROTTER....at Bottega Veneta?
- I am going to loose interest in Bottega Veneta instantly....Kering is lost!
 
Tbh, while Chanel isn’t the easiest house to design for, they imho have the easiest customers ; they aren’t fashion demanding at all, they have the means, they want cute and élégant Chanel-coded clothes that :
- don’t make them look 10 lbs heavier or 10 years older (thanks Virginie)
- are not «quiet luxury »
- show it’s Chanel
- have some novelty each season but not too much. And a bit of wow-factor in show présentations.
They aren’t asking for a 3-sleeves tweed jacket or see-trough skirts, or any intellectual concept of minimalism or else.

The less intellectual, the better.
Chanel RTW has to be frivolous fashion.
Unfortunately I don’t recall any frivolity within Matthieu Blazy’s work at BV.
It might be him or it might be BV’s codes for their art collectors target demographic.
 
Tbh, while Chanel isn’t the easiest house to design for, they imho have the easiest customers ; they aren’t fashion demanding at all, they have the means, they want cute and élégant Chanel-coded clothes that :
- don’t make them look 10 lbs heavier or 10 years older (thanks Virginie)
- are not «quiet luxury »
- show it’s Chanel
- have some novelty each season but not too much. And a bit of wow-factor in show présentations.
They aren’t asking for a 3-sleeves tweed jacket or see-trough skirts, or any intellectual concept of minimalism or else.

The less intellectual, the better.
Chanel RTW has to be frivolous fashion.
Unfortunately I don’t recall any frivolity within Matthieu Blazy’s work at BV.
It might be him or it might be BV’s codes for their art collectors target demographic.
With due respect, Karl didn't fit this characterization...
 
and who is the head of studio? or the team there?...
Im guessing that now it’s Augustin Dolmaillot (also CD of Barrie and honorary model for some shows under Karl) but from the little clip i saw and when i asked to some industry friends, they told me that the team hasn’t changed since Karl died but they don’t have that much info.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
213,407
Messages
15,221,180
Members
87,290
Latest member
4nglnnn
Back
Top