Hey Ungaro, thanks for your response!
Ungaro Kitty said:
What you are saying is not what I was trying to say. I'm not trying to say Europeans and Asians are the same people, just that people have been using the word Eurasian wrong.
Oh wait, what you are saying that I was saying...is not what I was saying either
! I think we were saying the same thing.
Just one thing though...I don't know my Russian history far back enough to know exactly how/when the ethnicities have mixed, so I won't go into that, but how do we define "ethnically Russian"? I know what you're saying and am almost tempted to agree in certain cases...but I still think it's potentially very dangerous to associate countries with ethnicities or "races" and dismiss other groups as mere "citizens"...I mean, look at the US. Nations are very modern constructs in human history, throughout which borders have been changing and people migrating.
I do stand by what I say about the Arabs...the ethnic mix goes much further back than French colonization...especially the Mediterranean countries like Lebanon, Syria, etc. (as opposed to the Gulf countries) lie at the juncture between Europe, Asia and Africa, and their ethnic mix reflects that. They've been part of the Roman Empire, mixed with the Crusaders, the Spanish, the Ottoman Empire...way before the British and the French colonization...and actually, I wouldn't be exaggerating when I say that half the Arabs I know (I know very very many, mostly from the northwestern side though
) are naturally very fair skinned with light brown hair, obviously so-called Caucasian. I'm just saying that it is a common misconception.
Anyway...I wouldn't have delved into this if it was off topic, but as it were, I'm questioning the topic itself. I still wonder why this topic is separate from the "biracial/mixed models" thread.
Unless we can define this thread, perhaps mods would like to merge them?