bluespring
Member
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2007
- Messages
- 76
- Reaction score
- 0
sorry i cant spell right! ;/
anyway i dont think lagerfield would do it for $, even if were not talking about younger demographics
they spent like $46 million for a 3 min film, do you really think they care about $$$ if they decided to cast frances??
since everyone is bitching about it
it does make good publicity maybe that would make good money
anyway i dont think lagerfield would do it for $, even if were not talking about younger demographics
they spent like $46 million for a 3 min film, do you really think they care about $$$ if they decided to cast frances??
since everyone is bitching about it
it does make good publicity maybe that would make good money
You're joking, right? And it's Chanel, not Channel (sorry it just REALLY annoys me... since all those kids wearing fake CC's can't even spell it right and it gets on my nerves)
Anyway, the most LOGICAL explanation is the $. Because that's what makes the world go 'round.