Givenchy Mens S/S 10 Paris

Discussion in 'Designers and Collections' started by ilaughead, Jun 26, 2009.

  1. KKnardi

    KKnardi Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2005
    Messages:
    5,394
    Likes Received:
    2
    not a interesting collection at all.
     
  2. BerlinRocks

    BerlinRocks New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2005
    Messages:
    11,242
    Likes Received:
    3
    diorboy @ ModelHommes Forum
     
  3. Scott

    Scott Stitch:the Hand

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2003
    Messages:
    12,969
    Likes Received:
    2
    i can see your distinction,berlin. it does have that sort of arabian knights feel about it.
     
  4. Mutterlein

    Mutterlein Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2004
    Messages:
    3,759
    Likes Received:
    283
    I moved to a new neighborhood 2 years ago and it was the first time I saw skaters like that, it's a way of dressing I am just now associating with being "skater".
     
  5. Zazie

    Zazie Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2005
    Messages:
    2,222
    Likes Received:
    5
    Hideous beyond words....:ninja:
     
  6. Dkammern

    Dkammern DÔMMkammern

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2006
    Messages:
    3,509
    Likes Received:
    0
    the lights could've gone after the 5th look and i'd tell you this is good.
    i don't get his vision for menswear. i really dont. i don't know who wears this, or where, or how can it possibly be styled to make it look half decent.
    It feels more like a bad pseudo-punk rehearsal of a tom of finland comic book, than a reflection of future (needless to say current) menswear fashion.
     
  7. simons

    simons Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2008
    Messages:
    678
    Likes Received:
    1
    it gets worse every time i come back and look at it, giving it another chance. i love love LOVE his work for womenswear but it seems he does not give a care for the menswear. his first collection was beyond spectacular but its been getting worse since. there are admit good (boring) pieces but if he thinks putting a "gothic" whatever urban iono print on some shirts are gonna fly, they should hire someone else to do the menswear. we want to wear nice things too!
     
  8. C0UTUR3 4 SUR3

    C0UTUR3 4 SUR3 New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2008
    Messages:
    198
    Likes Received:
    0
    I really like this. Not as much as his previous shows, but I'm happy he went in a different direction to keep things fresh. I really want those shoes.
     
  9. Demelza

    Demelza New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2009
    Messages:
    638
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'm sorry but i dislike the cast. Some of these boys look very muscular. That makes the collection look even worse.
     
  10. cesarcmma

    cesarcmma New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2008
    Messages:
    2,112
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think Cathy Horyn said it best.

     
  11. mikeijames

    mikeijames no tom ford, no thanks.

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2003
    Messages:
    5,880
    Likes Received:
    0
    it just shows that cathy horyn does not know what's she's talking about. even a little. perhaps she's trying to stir controversy to get herself un-invited from yet another show....:innocent:

    it's very telling to watch -- even in this forum -- as people RAVE about those transparent looks at dior homme, but decry them here. who else has presented leggings for men on the runway in the past few seasons? maybe marni? maybe calvin klein? also, stylists (generally speaking) do not sketch, do not select fabric, and do not sew the clothes! you're telling me this pair of pants is the work of a stylist....? this is laziness?!? and WHERE ON EARTH DO YOUNG PEOPLE DRESS LIKE THIS?! :angry:

    [​IMG]

    men.style.com
     
  12. the-raven

    the-raven New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2009
    Messages:
    185
    Likes Received:
    0
    i agree. cathy horyn comes across as a frustrated critic who has realised she no longer has a vaild opinion, so why not slate the only show this season that got a standing ovation?!? her write up is such a desparate effort to seem marginal, anything that exudes any form of sexuality intimidates her frigid sensibility.
     
  13. Zazie

    Zazie Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2005
    Messages:
    2,222
    Likes Received:
    5

    You can't be serious??? Different designers design differently - it doesn't mean that if one designer does a certain thing, eg. transparency, it should therefore be raved about when some other designer take up the same theme. KVA did transparency to show impeccable tailoring and construction details normally hidden, and also to layer shades and hues, eg. white under black, which Yohji Yamamoto did with his women's collection as beautifully. I don't know what kind of "transparency" Tisci is doing, didn't even notice it, since the show's more about gold studs, collaged stars at the crotch and hoods, and that's the whole problem isn't it. And anyone can like or dislike a collection, that's their right. You can agree or disagree, debate the outfits, etc., but no one should be insulted and disparaged for their criticisms.
     
  14. Zazie

    Zazie Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2005
    Messages:
    2,222
    Likes Received:
    5
    I personally think there's a lot of potential in the Urban Medieval Arabian Knight concept but it's so crudely and badly executed, it would have been better if he'd done something less "themed". Nicholas Ghesquiere did the Arab kefiyyeh before to fantastic effect - it's years ago but everyone picked it up and it's remembered.

    Bernherd Wilhelm did the same street warrior gangsta thing a few seasons ago, and he did it with more flair, imagination, conviction and yes, humour.
     
    #74 Zazie, Jun 30, 2009
    Last edited by moderator lumineux: Jun 30, 2009
  15. mikeijames

    mikeijames no tom ford, no thanks.

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2003
    Messages:
    5,880
    Likes Received:
    0
    this is impeccable tailoring?!

    [​IMG]

    men.style.com
     
  16. mikeijames

    mikeijames no tom ford, no thanks.

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2003
    Messages:
    5,880
    Likes Received:
    0
    anyone can like or dislike this collection on its merits. it's insulting and disparaging TO THE DESIGNER to call these clothes that footballers would get for free. clearly, more thought and craftmanship went into this collection. i mean, we all know that cathy horyn did not receive formal design training. and that's fine. but even she admits,

    which shows that other editors did actually have to explain to her the relevance of this look! and she goes further saying,

    since when do stylists CREATE mesh tops in gold? when do stylists decide to choose leather as a fabric for men's shorts (i guess givenchy and lanvin have the same stylists)? reducing a designer of tisci's education and stature to "a stylist" while praising actual stylists (who i do love) like miuccia prada and others just strikes me as ignorant or intentionally disingenuous.

    we can agree to disagree, but to trample on this work as if tisci didn't get inspiration from his travels, or choose the fabrics, or sketch these looks, or present them in a fresh, interesting way simply goes too far. we're all entitled to have our opinions, but it's not everyone's right to damage people's careers and their business based on a gut feeling that has no basis in reality.
     
  17. Dkammern

    Dkammern DÔMMkammern

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2006
    Messages:
    3,509
    Likes Received:
    0
    ^^
    Cathy Horyn doesnt go out damaging anyone's career, or at least not Tisci's. She has supported his collections for some time and i think it's only fair that she remarked this seems somewhat "out of touch" if she thinks it is.

    You've mentioned her lack of formal fashion training and you make it sound as if that was something bad, but you have to understand it's the New York Times she's writing for and she therefor focus goes beyond construction and other technical aspects. It is only natural that she tries to put this in context (that is, the whole Givenchy brand and it's evolution since the previous season, and what tisci has been doing for women too...)
    Her approach must be more on the "sociologic" side. If the styling is the most vanguardist, or he is the first to do gold mesh like this is rather irrelevant to her function stricto sensu.

    What tisci has done to Givenchy men is very weird to me. Because yes, he has most certainly covered a spot on the market that was empty and he is able to stick to it without distraction...
    BUT
    one i still really don't know what potential buyers seriously go for this (not even the soccer players horyn mentioned seem realistic -_-)

    two i just dont see why should it be givenchy doing it, when its men's clothing until now had been following a totally different direction (more like the first 6-7 looks maybe) and the raw sophistication of the collections for woman dont really do with this either.
     
    #77 Dkammern, Jun 30, 2009
    Last edited by moderator : Jun 30, 2009
  18. Spike413

    Spike413 barcode

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2004
    Messages:
    14,812
    Likes Received:
    1
    I have to say, as it happens at least once every season, that it comes off as completely juvenile when people say something to the effect of "Oh Cathy's just being a b**** cause she doesn't get it, or cause she's irrelevant, etc." because someone disagrees with her take on a collection.

    I'm sorry, but saying she doesn't know what she's talking about because you don't like her opinion? Come on people. Who are any of us to say this is good or bad?
     
  19. b9409

    b9409 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2009
    Messages:
    1,617
    Likes Received:
    0
    Are you serious? That is all we do here. The only thing.

    I do not see people saying "Frida's Gucci... who are we to say this is bad?" People murder her season after season...
     
  20. Spike413

    Spike413 barcode

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2004
    Messages:
    14,812
    Likes Received:
    1
    I'm quite serious. Every season I see at least one post in response to a review by Horyn blasting her simply because that person happens to disagree with what she says. I find it absurd and immature to question someone's credibility when speaking their mind and insulting them when you don't like what they have to say, and it begs the question "if she can't express her opinion on the collection without someone calling her out, then why the hell should anybody be allowed to?".
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice
monitoring_string = "058526dd2635cb6818386bfd373b82a4"