Her rep says she is not releasing any pics.
If they give the money to charity then why not? I would rather own the way my child's image is portrayed(because let's face it Halle Berry's kid is going to be hunted for a photo), than let some pap run after me and my newborn on the street and then sell the pic for a million.
It's not right that a baby should be subjected to this but it's the high cost of a celebrity life.
it's the height of interest that drives certain celebs' baby pictures to command it.What I see are other A-Listers like Cate Blanchette, Naomi Watts who didn't do that. And look at them they are doing just fine. If anything, in my opinion the celebs who do put their new borns on covers are seeking more attention.
And besides Halle seems like the Blanchette and Watts type, wants her personal life personal as much as she can keep it that way. Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie...well, no need to go any further.
What I see are other A-Listers like Cate Blanchette, Naomi Watts who didn't do that. And look at them they are doing just fine. If anything, in my opinion the celebs who do put their new borns on covers are seeking more attention.
And besides Halle seems like the Blanchette and Watts type, wants her personal life personal as much as she can keep it that way. Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie...well, no need to go any further.
^well Katie Holmes wasn't a beauty [she's not your glamorous, sexy beauty that is, but more like your all american midwest girl] but the baby pictures of Suri was in high demand simply because Tom Cruise's name was a attach to it.