Halston F/W 08.09 NYC

^I agree exactly with everything you said, I do think there are some nice pieces, i like the trenches and light fluid evening dresses but it really didnt meet my expectations for Halston.
 
This is the last of the pictures from Catwalking.com. I must say that i love it!!! i think it's off to a great start. was initially shocked at the lack of Halston colours, but turns out, orange was used!!!! i love that orange!!!!!:blush: GREAT JOB Marco!!!!:flower:
Thanks so much for posting this collection.:flower:
 
oh man....:doh:...

another depressing collection...

:(
 
I feel it's quite a literal interpretation of Halston. Like the highwaisted orange pants :shock: I don't think it's bad by any means but it just doesn't have that edge that Halston had
 
URGGGG. Some pieces are nice but seriously, this is the best you can come up with??
 
well I think he went about it the right way , but its more jil sander in flavor than Halston , but some the dresses are really simply cut and beautiful . He seems to be looking at early 70s halston , which was more minimimalistic . But I would still say this is the better of the new york collections , which all seem garish and too lady like.
 
He should have injected some glamour into this
 
^^ I was about to say those 2 looked similar. I wanted a little more glitz Studio 54 Halston...:woot:, but we got this:shock:
 
I feel in the minority who like it. I don't know if it's the Halston name that might be influencing me or maybe I might just like the aesthetic. It feels very much in the vein of Halstonesque simple but beautiful wearable American Sportswear. They did suprise me by not being Full tilt campy 70's Halston. Which I was afraid of. These clothes will sell and get them ready to put together a special colorfull spring collection. For now these clothes are agile and lovelly. Congrats Rachel and Zanini
 
I agree that this is very Jil Sander, but with a touch of Bottega and St. John even, in the daywear and it's layering. Halston was simple, but it was fun. You wanted to skip around in the daywear and boogie down in the dresses. This collection inspires none of the two. Another problem is the presentation. I understand not wanting to send out an army of Bianca Jaggers, but the minimal everything is a bit of a problem for me. It really washes some girls out and makes some of the bland pieces in terms of cut and color even less interesting.

That said, I do think there is some promise. Marco nailed a few of the dresses, such as the grey toga-like dress on Liya and that long pale blue wrap-waist dress. I even really love the orange skirt suit; I think it's quintessentially Halston and very easy. Some of the layering is frighteningly matronly, while others are far too Calvin Klein with the minimal silhouettes and the palette.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I feel it's quite a literal interpretation of Halston. Like the highwaisted orange pants :shock: I don't think it's bad by any means but it just doesn't have that edge that Halston had

Yes...I agree Meg & that's exactly what he said in the NY Times article:

With this collection, I’ve tried not to over-design, I want simple, well-made clothes that connect with Halston’s approach in the early 1970s, when a lot of his things were made on the bias and with relatively few cuts.
He did exactly just that & actually this collection is a bit of a relief on my eyes after seeing so many prints this week:blink:
 
This is pretty much what I would have expected.. I don't hate it, but I'm not obsessed. In general though I think they did a great collection, and really kept the Halston name in mind. They're trying to carry on the tradition, not turn it into Gucci or Versace. I think it was a great choice to go with all solids, no patterns. The gowns are gorgeous especially the white one.
 
attachment.php
attachment.php


i am predicting that these are the two dresses that net-a-porter will put for sale tomorrow...


:innocent:...


:p
 
its soothing to look at , after all the fur, stupid hats and berets, tacky prints thats for sure
 
Well, it's nothing like I was expecting. I know it would have been cliche to do the glamour thing, but I think that's what most NY fashion is truly lacking, edgy, sleek, sophistication and a healthy dose of sensuality. This is in the same vein as Jil Sander and Calvin Klein, except they both have those details that make it desirable and original.

This isn't bad, but it's kind of boring. The colors aren't really helping it either, it's either those muddy shades of taupe or super saturated 70's colors. It was a golden opportunity, a star making kind of moment, but it fell flat.

In trying to avoid being literal or overly referential, he kind of sacrificed the joy and appeal of it all.

There are beautiful pieces to be found, but I was hoping for much more.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
i will say this , he kept with the early 70s halston minimalism and modernized it up but though its not the best , its pretty good and he isnt like another Frida , who does her own **** and deviates from the house aesthetic , so he kept true to that
 
The pieces are very light and fluid and I like the mostly monochromatic palette but I'm not too excited about this collection. It's fine.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
213,891
Messages
15,241,929
Members
87,841
Latest member
kellanphil
Back
Top