Creative
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2007
- Messages
- 5,098
- Reaction score
- 2,639
Bringing your style to the house you are currently designing for is natural.This ↑ very much encapsulates it. Yes, Slimane changes. He evolves. He's not static; but he has his own specific codes — the rail-thin silhouette, the predominance of monochrome, an adherence to a certain demimonde aesthetic — and those codes will always come before any pre-existing codes of the house he inherits. Case in point: YSL was very much about gold — lots and lots of shiny, blingy gold. Donald Trump levels of gold. The more gold the better. But Hedi Slimane... he doesn't like gold. He likes silvery chrome. So... buh-bye gold, even though it's a YSL code. Why? Because it's not a Slimane code.
I personally think Hedi Slimane should be the creative director of the house of Hedi Slimane. He's shown that his vision is so strong that he's going to make House of Slimane products wherever he goes. He's not Karl Lagerfeld, who could adapt himself one way to Chanel and another to Fendi and a third way to Chloé. It's not that he's untalented or a bad designer — but he is a bit like a parasite that infiltrates a brand, replicates himself, and, once he's used up whatever inspiration and resources he can suck out of that brand, he moves onto the next fashion house to repeat the process.
Tom Ford did that at YSL, Michele did that at Valentino, Tisci did that at Burberry, Galliano did that at Margiela, etc.
Karl is literally the only one who was a total chameleon. The rest… are not. And it’s actually nothing to blame them about.
Also, as stated before, Hedi has given a different version of himself in every brand he’s been to.