Lena said:i dont understand what 'masthead' means,
but if its is about crediting my work, its a must to me, i wont style or write a thing without claiming credit..
The case of the missing masthead
Oh, the masthead. It's the bizarre holy grail of magazine hierarchy. Editors, from the time they are mere interns, executive assistants, and EAs, dream that someday their names will loom over a sea of underthings.
The Atlantic, (formerly Atlantic Monthly) is, undoubtedly, no exception. Regarded by some as one of the top publications in the nation, working there is what young journos dream of their entire lives. Little boys reading the book reviews in Couriers and Heralds everywhere don't see their name in lights. They see their name in bold, on a masthead.
Recently, though, David Bradley decided to shake things up a bit. After his mag lost their EIC, Bradley pulled a Village Voice move, keeping the managing editor in an EIC role with no title change. Then that guy left, so ... now they just don't have any masthead at all. (Except the one that's still online.)
The accompanying editorial changeover, however, is on a slower schedule. Rather than showcasing a rebuilt masthead, the current issue of The Atlantic includes no masthead at all.The New Yorker doesn't have a masthead, which seems to work for them. But can you imagine if all the mastheads disappeared from Conde Nast magazines? Everyone would be, looking at people they weren't supposed to be looking at, answering e-mails from their senior editors, sitting at the wrong tables at lunch, eating omelets all over the place. It would just be utter, complete madness. And soo much fun to watch
Avant Garde said:Whenever I flip through Vogue, Anna Wintour's name is always on the top and in the biggest font out of everyone else's name. Its definetly a reflection of how much power she has. Either that, or she has a big ego
softgrey said:i understand what it means to full time staffers....
but what about for freelancers...
and what about if the publications you work for are foreign...
i mean...
i know people are checking the conde nast mastheads...
but are they checking numero, flair, oyster...etc...?
and if you have on-page credit are you still demanding a place on the masthead...?
softgrey said:i understand what it means to full time staffers....
but what about for freelancers...
and what about if the publications you work for are foreign...
i mean...
i know people are checking the conde nast mastheads...
but are they checking numero, flair, oyster...etc...?
and if you have on-page credit are you still demanding a place on the masthead...?
Lena said:freelancers deserve their place on masthead and like stylebites, i always have a quick glance to all magazines comming my way
its a good way to prove one's collaboration with a publication, so never mind what the magazine i'd say, always ask to be mentioned, its the best way to get new offers for work
smartarse said:but let's just say the conditions (contract) were that you're only a freelancer for the company not on their regular payroll therefore, you cannot or should not asked for recognition which includes, no masthead included. cases like that do occur.