How to wear clothes
The bun
[FONT=Geneva,Arial,sans-serif]
Jess Cartner-Morley
Saturday January 28, 2006
The Guardian
[/FONT]When I was at school - granted, this was many, many years ago, but I can just about remember - all the girls with style aspirations wore their hair in artfully dishevelled up-dos. Only we didn't call them up-dos; we called them "buns". In recent years, this simple, slightly bluestocking moniker has spookily disappeared from beauty writing, but back then we called a bun a bun.
Anyway. Observing the schoolgirls who share my bus in the morning these days, I have noticed that the bun now goes into decline around age 14; the older girls aspire to a sleeker, shinier, more overtly feminine-charm tone to their look - a troop of wannabe Mrs Beckhams. Old-fashioned as I am, I prefer the bun, which is why I am very pleased to note that, on the catwalk and premiere circuit at least, there is a definite move away from hair that looks as if it has been groomed with a Corby trouser press. Instead, the look of the moment is slightly wavy and aspires to look natural even when it's not.
This will be given momentum by spring 2006's more relaxed aesthetic: after winter's Hitchcock heroines and pencil skirts, think broderie anglaise and empire-line day dresses, which lend themselves more to artful messiness than to hair ironed into submission. Beneath the froth of seasonal trends, the undercurrent looks to be moving away from the military standards of grooming, of which ironed hair, along with year-round fake tans and everlasting French manicures, are part. The bun, with its "love interest in a French art-house movie" kind of appeal, may not be ready for the Oscar red carpet quite yet, but mark my words, it will soon be back on north London buses, which is a start.