Kim Kardashian

[MissyJG]

Exactly how can someone's body shape make them look "cheap"?

If I look at pictures from this week..

Kim kardashian

celebrity gossip

And even though imo bodycon dresses look better on women with curves, in Kim's case, it can (depending on how she styles it) easily make her look cheap giving you a p*rn star vibe. But overall, I think she's and her stylist are doing a great job and I do love her style!

 

[4everinprogress]

I think it's less about body shape/silhouette and more about the actual clothing choices and how one puts the outfits together.

 

[MissyJG]

^well, yes and no. Cause we say, dress for your body for a reason. Cause not every body can pull off everything. It's a bit of both I guess.

 

[FASHIONLOVA]

ya it s mostly her choice of clothing, Monica Rose can only do so much. if Kim wants to wear something she ll wear it
and from what we can see she like skin tight garments better

 

[CherryBomb01]

I really like the LAX pics outfit. Awesome jacket and boots, that little hat looks cute on her too.

 

[FASHIONLOVA]

 

[Ashcottmanor]

^ God, how annoying.

 

[Dego]

Indeed.

There's a reason I don't dress like her. I'd hate to be reduced to that. But hey, if she has nothing more to offer, then I guess it's OK. Girl has to make a living.

You are doing a fair bit of reducing yourself, in this post. Why couldn't she have "more to offer", even while wearing a curve-/body-revealing outfit?

 

[Ashcottmanor]

"Exactly how can someone's body shape make them look "cheap?"

Definition: "brassy: tastelessly showy" From Princeton.edu

When you show some or all of your boobs, legs, butt etc. to some that is considered, as stated above, "Tastelessly showy." That in return makes them look cheap. Kim has been a victim of this numerous times. Maybe you don't think her showing almost all of her boobs is cheap, but the general consensus among women would be that it is. One may not choose to have gigantic boobs ( I honestly don't believe this is the case for Kim, but whatever that's speculation) but to show them off in the manner that she sometimes does where they are falling out of her dresses, shirts etc. would be considered cheap. Whether one likes it or not, it's one of the rules of today's society today.

 

[nita-karoliina]

I dont know what it is but i find this girls laugh amazingly cute!

 

[VivaciousCohen]

When wearing too tight pants, she needs a longer shirt.

I love her hair in long, loose waves. The tight pony doesn't do it for me.

 

[Aoedele]

Are you serious? A definition of cheap, what is this grade school? Someone has way too much time on their hands. This is the go to thread for a giggle.

 

[MissyJG]

^ what's so weird about it? She's just trying to make her point.

 

[Aoedele]

How did I miss Mason in that picture? He is too adorable.

 

[lizbabe09]

Kim Kardashian - Victoria's Secret 2011 'SWIM' collection launch at Club L in Los Angeles - March 30, 2011



tlfan

 

[lebigt]

Enough with the nude shoes. Ugh, she's lucky she's pretty.

 

[Versace-Goddess]

I like this. It suits her well. It looks sexy without being trashy and elegant with a fresh touch.

 

[The_Ida]

You are doing a fair bit of reducing yourself, in this post. Why couldn't she have "more to offer", even while wearing a curve-/body-revealing outfit?

Because that is all she does. She has no job. All she does is dress up for the paps.

I just value other things about myself than my boobs. I don't have to make a living off them, so there's no reason why everyone should see them.

 

[Emilee]

celebrity-paradise

 

[Emilee]

celebrity-paradise