I think that the inclusion of Jane has paid off for the organisers. Because we are all talking about the event,and she has given it a fair bit of publicity which it might not have otherwise garnered. As much as it may be seen to be outdated to some,I love the idea of debutante balls. And I'm with Luluposh on this one. I think that it is a shame that it has changed so much. The deb ball in The UK has just been reinstated I believe
As for Kitty ^ ^, I don't know what was going through her mind If anything at all. I have met her on a few occasions,and I didn't expect anything like what she was wearing. Jane did look good in chanel,and Francesca Eastwood also looked very beautiful. But the best girl for me has to be Autumn Whitaker
I basically agree with your views as well
but on one point I differ is: well has it really paid off? Sure, we're talking about it, but its hardly in a positive light. Though there are so many issues of political correctness that its often difficult to say anything at all!
No, but what I meant was, if the inclusion of Jane resulted to the public going "oh yay! meritocracy/egalitarianism is awesome! - the organisers are so progressive!" then I suppose that could be a positive for the organisers.
However I think that the inherent contradictions of this event - an event that is by definition elitist, or perhaps more neutrally "closed", the concept of making it more accessible or relateable is just kind of nonsensical.
I mean its no big deal, but I suppose its an interesting talking point when considering social changes and such.
PS. I'm not dissing any of the individual girls btw! I think Autumn is the "belle of the ball" here - she looks stunning. In fact all the girls look quite pretty, though I can't say I love many of the dresses.
Last edited by a moderator: