The one thing that I found kept distracting me was the huge similarity it had to Prada, the shoes, the styling, the lack of dresses... imitation is the highest form of flattery, but Katie's obsession with Miuccia is going a step too far.
The one thing that I found kept distracting me was the huge similarity it had to Prada, the shoes, the styling, the lack of dresses... imitation is the highest form of flattery, but Katie's obsession with Miuccia is going a step too far.
Agreed 100%. This felt like His own show in NY and Prada merged into one collection. I don't particularly enjoy pointing fingers but his references couldn't be any more obvious. It's as if he takes a Prada collection and exaggerates it ten fold to a point where it's almost unrecognizable yet the base and inspiration is still visible. It's incredibly annoying.
I suppose no one read my comment:
There's also the giant pailletes, the A-line and the distinctive Prada-esque underlayer of cropped pants beneath long coat-dresses and skirts. Merge these with the period Marc Jacobs collection with their portrait collars, slap on lots of giant old-fashioned jeweled buttons, and voila, LV Fall/Winter.
A person must be truly oblivious if they don't understand the obvious similarities. Of course it's not a carbon copy, but it's basically blanketing a reference with a layer of camoflouge weather it be from his own show or Miuccia's, in this case both.
The whole "he's copying Prada" thing has gotten tired. Marc has had this retro ragamuffin vision forever. Both he and Miuccia reference the same periods in history over and over. I'm not sure why it's viewed only as "Miuccia's style" when it's clear both she and Marc are drawing water from the same well.