Bidwell said:
Do we have a "Burn in hell, Marc!" thread? Or better yet, it deserves its own site.
I'm appalled by the sheer vitriol being thrown at him. It didn't work out, 2 hrs were lost in the precious press' lives and now this? Don't tell me Ms. Menkes didn't go out of her way to not only write something horrible but to headline it.
At least he has GUTS.
When his critics are still figuring out what it all meant 6 months from now, he'll have moved on. Such is the world of fashion where most constantly yearn for things the way they were last season.
Of note, When CDG paid hommage to Westwood in the most flagrant way, did it provoke such slaughter?
People outside fashion really don't realize the rather unglamorous hard work and problems involved in getting everything delivered on time for a presentation.
This probably explains why NY is so bland and safe because there is not enough time to get anything other than a bolt of black or neutral delivered on time. I bet most collections are really pre-collections for the market and not really done for a presentation per se.
His work is particularly American, his second line is rock solid and saleable and NY will obviously be the worse for not having him. Sad.
I don't think it's vitriol, Bidwell, I think it's honesty.
At least Suzy Menkes and some of her fellow journalists have
GUTS, too!

If you admire that quality in MJ, shouldn't you also admire the same quality in them?
Would it be better for everyone to, insincerely, say 'Very well done, Marc!' every season, no matter what he's put on the runway and metaphorically pat him on the head?
Where would that get anybody (least of all him)? He'd just end up believing his own hype and then wondering why the sales figures didn't seem to match the reviews any more.
I'm absolutely sure Suzy Menkes was annoyed by his lateness and that may well have made her slightly more free with her criticism and less tactful than usual (although, she is known for her unsentimental reporting, anyway); but that openess may have, ultimately, done Marc a favour, IMO.
We all know that, for a NY designer, he has guts; he is constantly (and rightfully) praised for that. But having guts, whilst others don't, doesn't make you infallible.
I really don't think the critics of this collection (and it is criticism of the collection - not him personally, or his previous work, or potential) don't understand it and TBH, I think it is slightly patronising of you to keep suggesting that; especially your talk about 'common denominators'.
For goodness sake, he even used the term 'Emperor's New Clothes' himself! Admittedly, about the Charles Atlas filmed version, where the models only wore accessories and underwear; but the term was, obviously, praying on his mind!
I also don't think that journalists and most people on this forum constantly yearn for things as they were last season; unless they were immeasurably better and/or more relevant last season, of course. Believing that fashion is better when it evolves, is not yearning for last season, it is yearning for something other than the empty feeling one gets after another gluttoness, but ultimately unsatisfying, gorge on fast fashion.
I certainly doubt that, when Marc (the talented guy that he, undoubtedly, is) produces something far better next season, many will be yearning for this collection.
I actually think that it would be a very good idea for him to move to Paris. His last collection would not have been out of place there at all, IMO.
At the end of the day, I think what matters far more than where he shows, is that he is given the time he needs to produce his best work.