We often overrate Maria Grazia 's commercial success.
She was there, at the right place, when the luxury market boomed.
The first collections of Virginie were also more comercially successful than Karl's. Was she better?
I don't think so. It has more to do with general consumer trends.
Many houses experienced a similar growth during those years, and the ones that didn't was probably because extremely chaotic management (Lanvin, I can imagine also Givenchy).
Now the general consumer trend is receding (to analyze the reasons would be complex).
Can we blame Maria Grazia for the disappointing results at Dior?
Neither.
She is the same, like ten years ago.
To blame her for consumer fatigue... it's unfair. Either you were exhausted already at the third show or you just loved her style. She is not lacking fantasy since five or six seasons: she never had any.
There is more imagination in one of the outfits of Il Casanova di Fellini than in the whole collection that we just saw (to pick a movie done in Cinecittà, at Rome)
The only real comercial-success makers in the last decade were Slimane and whoever is behind the Miu Miu boom.
All the rest were surfing the wave.
I almost always agree with you but I have to differ here.
MGC had a very clear vision of her Dior (even if I hated it) and she boosted the business because she's a great marketer. She did a boutique line for RTW, which Dior never had before, it was called 30 Montaigne and was a commercial success. RTW exploded under her, Tshirts, jeans, skirts, the new bar jacket, windbreakers, dresses...
For the bags, she did amazing. The launch of the Book Tote, the saddle, the new editions of the Lady Dior (with the flap), in canvas... The 30 Montaigne was also quite huge.
For the shoes as well... She had the Converse, the J'adior being a success from minute 1.
The fashion acc were better curated than before and the category also exploded.
VV at Chanel is a completely different story. She followed what Karl did and her collections did better because of the brand itself (openings, marketing and businesses strategies, etc). She didn't have a vision. She didn't change Chanel. She didn't launch anything (the garbage bag aside).
People don't know how small Dior was before MGC. Now it's a top 5 brand and I must say it's thanks to her vision and Pietro's. If there's something undeniable is that she was a great commercial success and that she had a very sharp vision regarding product and the business.
And for fashion fatigue, it's her fault actually. Since she's a one trick pony, you get tired. JW at Loewe was there for 10 years and tbh, there was no fatigue and it felt fresh all the time.
Edit: I forgot that she was the one redoing the oblique. Before her, it didn't exist in people's minds. Now it's a staple and as famous as the LV monogram.