Mary Kate & Ashley Olsen (Please put any and all MK&A related gossip in here) #1

Status
Not open for further replies.
That is very serious... very serious. Basically what it leads to the thought, well she had something to do with some part of the situation as a whole. If you ask for immunity , than you are a bit worried you could be put away. There is no other reason not to talk , to authorites unless you are in the wrong.
 
It was serious enough for her to release a statement today, ever since The AP confirmed it all...
 
I hate how they're trying to make her somehow guilty for his death. At least, that's how i feel it. I mean, he's responsible for his actions, no one ever forced him to do anything, so..

By the way, what could she be guilty of? Giving him OxyContin? I wonder how they're going to prove it.
 
I hate how they're trying to make her somehow guilty for his death. At least, that's how i feel it. I mean, he's responsible for his actions, no one ever forced him to do anything, so..

By the way, what could she be guilty of? Giving him OxyContin? I wonder how they're going to prove it.

The whole asking for immunity thing makes her look guilty but other than that she should just talk to them and get it over with. If there is nothing to hide, it shouldn't be problem. She just got caught in the middle...unless there's more to the story.
 
More from a more reliable news source, ABC News.

What Does Olsen Know About Heath's Death?

Mary-Kate Olsen May Be Forced to Testify in Federal Criminal Probe of Ledger's Death

BY LUCHINA FISHER AND RICHARD ESPOSITO

Aug. 4, 2008—

Does Mary-Kate Olsen have something to hide?
After Olsen refused to cooperate with investigators, a federal grand jury issued a subpoena as part of a criminal investigation into the source of the drugs that killed her close friend Heath Ledger, ABC News has learned.

The federal investigation into Ledger's death hit a roadblock in the form of the pint-sized actress. Sources close to the investigation said Olsen is the final witness in their investigation but has so far refused numerous requests to her lawyer Michael Miller to cooperate.

According to government sources, the subpoena was issued on April 23, but the U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency, which launched an investigation after Ledger's accidental death from a prescription drug cocktail, has not yet served Olsen with it. The agency and her lawyer are still trying to work out a deal in which the actress receives immunity in exchange for her cooperation, the sources said.

Miller, Olsen's attorney issued the following statement Monday afternoon: "Despite tabloid speculation, Mary-Kate Olsen had nothing whatsoever to do with the drugs found in Heath Ledger's home or his body, and she does not know where he obtained them. Regarding the Government's investigation, at Ms. Olsen's request, we have provided the Government with relevant information including facts in the chronology of events surrounding Mr. Ledger's death and the fact that Ms. Olsen does not know the source of the drugs Mr. Ledger consumed. We don't know the source of the information being quoted in the media regarding the Government's inquiry, but these descriptions are incomplete and inaccurate."
The United States Attorney's Office, which has the authority to grant immunity, refused to comment on an ongoing investigation.

Agents have able to determine the source for all the drugs Ledger ingested, except for one, the powerful painkiller OxyContin, which they believe was obtained illegally.

Government sources told ABC News that investigators have run down "every legitimate lead" on where Ledger might have obtained the OxyContin. Now, in light of her refusal to cooperate, investigators are focused on whether Olsen may have supplied the potent pills to Ledger.

"Maybe she did, or her MD did, maybe she had her own supply and shared it with him," one government source said.

Olsen is still considered a witness and not a suspect in the criminal probe, according to sources. But without her cooperation or until she is brought before a grand jury, the government appears unlikely to determine where the OxyContin came from.

Sources say all the other prescription drugs obtained in the United States -- from a doctor in Texas and another in LA -- were legitimately acquired.

The DEA is still running down leads on other drugs found in Ledger's possession that appear to have been acquired in Italy and the United Kingdom.

Olsen was the first person called after her masseuse discovered Ledger's body in his SoHo apartment in January. Instead of calling 911, Olsen reportedly phoned her bodyguards, who arrived on the scene at the same time as paramedics.

Investigators believe they have interviewed everyone connected to Ledger and his death, including the masseuse, bodyguards, doctors, housekeepers, business associates and even the mother of his 2-year-old daughter, Matilda, his "Brokeback Mountain" co-star Michelle Williams.

Erin Mulvey, a DEA spokesperson, said that in the past two years prescription drug abuse has soared, particularly among young people. According to a recent study, one in 10 students in grades 8, 10 and 12, admitted to using Viocodin and one in 20 confessed to using OxyContin.

http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/Blotter/story?id=5511521&page=1
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I hate how they're trying to make her somehow guilty for his death. At least, that's how i feel it. I mean, he's responsible for his actions, no one ever forced him to do anything, so..

By the way, what could she be guilty of? Giving him OxyContin? I wonder how they're going to prove it.

Drug dealers whose "clients" die of a fatal overdose from drugs that can be proved came from them can be charged with manslaughter and homicide, but it's really uncommon. I have no idea if MK could be considered a "dealer" or if they would even charge her with this, but who knows.

I have no idea how they are going to prove she gave it to him if they don't have any physical proof though. An easy way would be if they found a rx bottle and had her name and address on the label. But obviously they didn't find that.

I won't believe anything until there's proof or when she gets served and testifies but I don't like the idea that you are completely absent of guilt if you help someone kill themself. :ninja:

I just don't understand why she didn't cooperate fully with the DEA, she's just making more problems for herself.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
i really never knew that they had more than a passing relationship. A reason I really liked heath ledger was because he wasn't really in tabloids, he was a gifted actor who worked on his talent , unlike most today. I dont even remember seeing any sort of picture with the two in it. Being at the same party as someone is so different than hanging out with them.

If she loaned him some painkillers...I dont know.. I think they take that pretty serious, but this is going to spin out of control.
 
^^oh ok. Thanks for the article.
Well i agree with you, i really don't get why she doesn't cooperate and to do so, asks for immunity...That's quite weird.

IMO MK called her bodyguards because she had left some compromising stuff at Heath's place and wanted them to take it back.
 
There is only one reason she would ask for immunity, and it's related to why her body guards were on the scene. That is their task, after all, to protect.

It's not her fault. It happens. He just came from London where he had other things, and he got some of hers instead. It wasn't a good idea, and he made a mistake. It's certainly a cautionary tale if there ever was one.
 
^^oh ok. Thanks for the article.
Well i agree with you, i really don't get why she doesn't cooperate and to do so, asks for immunity...That's quite weird.

IMO MK called her bodyguards because she had left some compromising stuff at Heath's place and wanted them to take it back.

Which is basically what everyone thinks but hasn't asked her. Not that she would admit it anyway, I mean who would? She could get in loads of trouble. :shock:
 
From Yahoo news...

NEW YORK, New York -- As the investigation surrounding Heath Ledger's accidental overdose continues, the federal Drug Enforcement Administration office in New York has confirmed to Access Hollywood that they have issued a subpoena that would force Mary-Kate Olsen to testify in front of a grand jury.


Five medications were found in Heath's body at the time of his death, according to the DEA, three of which he'd obtained via doctors in Texas and Los Angeles. At the center of the investigation is how he acquired Oxycontin and Vicodin without a legal prescription.


The actress was the first person called by the masseuse who discovered Heath's body after the "The Dark Knight" actor's untimely death.

She broke her silence for the first time on Monday, when a rep for the actress told Access in a statement that she "had nothing whatsoever to do with the drugs found in Heath Ledger's home or his body, and she does not know where he obtained them."


However, despite the rep's statement that they "have provided the Government with relevant information," the actress is reportedly refusing to speak to government officials without immunity.


According to Benjamin Brafman, a high-profile defense attorney not associated with the case, seeking immunity is not the same as admitting guilt.


"It may not mean anything other than she's getting good legal advice," Brafman told Access.


"You don't know what the DEA may suspect in this case and I think it's a cautious way to proceed. I think it would be wrong to assume she's done something criminal simply because she's invoking her 5th amendment against self-incrimination."
 
This whole story makes me sick. No one can be to blame for his death, and it's sad how so much publicity/news goes into a celebrity even after they've passed. They found what was in his body, just let him rest in peace. Just imagine what it's like for his family.

MK probably feels a ton of guilt, even though it's uncertain whether she'd given him anything at all. I read another article which said that asking for immunity is just a "wise legal choice". I'm sure she has tons of people helping her with legal decisions, and courts can make anyone look guilty.
 
So I have a question. IF MK had left something comprimising at Heath's apartment and had her bodygaurds go cover it up for her, how the hell would the masseuse of all people know to call her first? This whole thing is very confusing, obviously b/c we're missing many details. But I think I'm going to give MK the benefit of doubt for right now.
 
So I have a question. IF MK had left something comprimising at Heath's apartment and had her bodygaurds go cover it up for her, how the hell would the masseuse of all people know to call her first? This whole thing is very confusing, obviously b/c we're missing many details. But I think I'm going to give MK the benefit of doubt for right now.

It's possible the masseuse saw MK's name on a medicine bottle...that's one theory. A stretch for sure, but a theory nonetheless being floated.

Anyway I heard tonight that she will be subpoenaed afterall, she must hate the NY papers right now.
 
^very reasonable theory considering what happened.

Is anyone else really, really worried about this? For some reason it's making me tense.. I'm not normally like this over celebrity issues!
 
what does this immunity mean? she won't speak without it?
 
^^it means whatever information she shares , if it is incriminating , they cannot prosecute her.
 
So I have a question. IF MK had left something comprimising at Heath's apartment and had her bodygaurds go cover it up for her, how the hell would the masseuse of all people know to call her first? This whole thing is very confusing, obviously b/c we're missing many details. But I think I'm going to give MK the benefit of doubt for right now.

According to the article in #665 it was her masseuse.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
213,090
Messages
15,208,869
Members
87,048
Latest member
jewelz
Back
Top