Matthieu Blazy - Designer, Creative Director of Chanel | Page 94 | the Fashion Spot

Matthieu Blazy - Designer, Creative Director of Chanel

According to Blue Square, there will be two shows, the first at 3pm (9pm in Paris), the second at 7pm (1am in Paris) and the show video will stream at 8pm (2am in Paris). The show location will be revealed in a few hours.
 
Kristen is still an ambassador? Surprised they haven't moved on from her.
With Carole Bouquet and Vanessa Paradis still being linked to the brand after all those years, she may be link to the brand forever.

Hopefully her style will get better as she ages.
 
This hurts my eyes… First one is unflattering and the second one again with that harsh red and those ugly cheap prints!! Very Proenza indeed!!
I think it’s the wearer’s body that is unflattering. Nothing will look the way it’s supposed to look if you don’t have the right skeleton to flatter the clothes. Broad shoulders and long legs are essential.
 
^^
I oddly like those shoes. Over pants only though for me.
These are very tiring subjects. Can't they just make the damn clothes fit? Is it so much to ask for?
We can start by buying clothes that fit us lol. And remember that we aren’t sample size, celebrities aren’t and even models aren’t ahaha.

The dress on Gisele had a total different look on the runway. And while it fitted her body perfectly, I’m not sure I like the look of the dress on that way.

But it’s terrible I think we are all so used to comfort. The loose fit is a dangerous and addictive thing.
I have lost most of my baby weight but I can’t wear skinny pants.
 
why did Chanel and Dior both suddenly decided that wearing flowers on thighs is flattering?
and this :lol:
View attachment 1438500
The only 10/10 this season is Tom Ford (I mean the bar is low af, this is a 1-10 scale for 2025 though). I can’t believe people can say it without feeling like a flattery person. Okay, I know you're scared of losing your future invitations, but at least keep your dignity lol.
 
why did Chanel and Dior both suddenly decided that wearing flowers on thighs is flattering?
and this :lol:
View attachment 1438500
So lame!! The only feedback that matters should be from the Chanel customer!! We don’t care what an “influencer” has to say!! Or people who are paid to speak positively!!
 
I have nothing else to say...
CHANEL PreFall vs Bottega SS23
I can't believe the vision Pavlovsky and Nair had to project CHANEL in the future was becoming a Bottega knock off with 3x increased price tag
View attachment 1438701View attachment 1438702
noooooooo that's his design signature his style its not bottega ...lol. hedi does the same thing at every house but Blazy is authentic is revolutionizing Chanel :)
 
Bianca Bosatra - Highsnobiety

CHANEL NAMING A$AP ROCKY AS BRAND AMBASSADOR PERFECTLY CAPTURES WHAT'S WRONG WITH HIGH-END FASHION RIGHT NOW

A$AP Rocky is undeniably cool. He has impeccable taste. His style influence is real. But his partnership with Chanel feels hollow—a symptom of luxury fashion's growing identity crisis.

Here's what's troubling: Chanel doesn't have a menswear line. They've made that clear. Yet they're appointing a male rapper as ambassador whose partner, Rihanna, is literally the face of Parfums Christian Dior. Rocky sells merch with AWGE and releases collaborations with PUMA Group—distressed sneakers, racing-inspired graphics, mass-market streetwear plays. So why is Chanel, a house built on exclusivity, craftsmanship, and feminine codes, associating with this? There's no authentic connection between Rocky's creative output and Chanel's heritage. It reads as pure hype-chasing.

The recent campaign shows Rocky chasing Margaret Qualley through NYC to propose with a Chanel ring. It's visually polished but narratively empty. Why does this story matter? What does it say about Chanel? Nothing. It's spectacle without substance—much like the partnership itself.

No one doubts Matthieu Blazy's technical brilliance. His October debut was masterfully crafted—the industry gave him a standing ovation. But beautiful clothes aren't enough anymore. Where's the emotional connection? The cultural point of view? The story that makes people believe in something beyond the product? Blazy inherited a confused brand strategy. Chanel is simultaneously chasing hype through ambassadors like Rocky while maintaining haute couture prestige. They're targeting youth culture but designing for legacy clients. They're pushing commercial revenue goals while claiming artistic integrity. The vision is muddled.

And Chanel isn't alone. Across luxury fashion, brands are collapsing into the same aesthetic: the upper-class woman with taste, the gender-fluid influencer, the celebrity ambassador seeding product. Everyone claims the same customer. Everyone deploys the same playbook. Miu Miu cracked a code and suddenly every brand wants that customer, that sensibility, that cultural cache. But when everyone plays the same game, luxury loses its meaning. Distinction disappears. And we're left with beautifully made clothes that inspire nothing.

What luxury fashion desperately needs: Less obsession with hype. Less celebrity seeding for short-term noise. More courage to build long-term brand worlds with clear creative direction. More willingness to alienate the wrong audience to deeply connect with the right one. More focus on why the brand exists beyond driving revenue. Fashion used to create culture. Now it just reflects it back, hoping for virality.

If Chanel can't articulate why Rocky belongs in their universe beyond "he's cool and famous," then the partnership is just another symptom of an industry that's forgotten how to tell stories that matter.
No alternative text description for this image
 
Shoes were strongest part of his work for Chanel so far, even though I did like some clothes from debut collection. Even if they are just color variations on Chanel's classic two tone shoes and a play with silhouette a bit. They in a way feel for me like a nod to very early 2000s footwear with these colors, like teal. 2000-2001 seasons were had some elaborate leather designs and Italian footwear labels had quite few of them at time too. Though these were in turn referencing 80s... I wonder when the 2000 revival of 80s will be revived, by the way.

In certain internet spaces I feel like Blazy's appointment made people feel like they are allowed to like Chanel again. Because many of them hate Karl and Virginie, by extension.
In certain internet spaces I feel like Blazy's appointment made people feel like they are allowed to like Chanel again.
Because many of them hate Karl and Virginie, by extension.

Because it looks like amalgamation of everything current out there now for last 10 years but will they buy it ?
For me the chanel is club not everyone needs to be in it even when i hate overt logos and did not like all that past cd´s did but both contributed to its huge growth and if current clients say the want x i think they have most right to be upset.

because like every club once every one that previously was not in it once things change and they enter its beginning of the end and thing get middle of the road and lost.

but good luck to this new chanel club renovation and its new willing to sign up new members :)
 
Shoes were strongest part of his work for Chanel so far, even though I did like some clothes from debut collection. Even if they are just color variations on Chanel's classic two tone shoes and a play with silhouette a bit. They in a way feel for me like a nod to very early 2000s footwear with these colors, like teal. 2000-2001 seasons were had some elaborate leather designs and Italian footwear labels had quite few of them at time too. Though these were in turn referencing 80s... I wonder when the 2000 revival of 80s will be revived, by the way.
I like his shoes too. I never really liked the idea of stiletto heels at Chanel (I don't like flat shoes at Dior either), but the slightly thicker heel and lower vamp make them so much more convincing.
In certain internet spaces I feel like Blazy's appointment made people feel like they are allowed to like Chanel again. Because many of them hate Karl and Virginie, by extension.
Chanel comes with the baggage of being a "dusty old lady" house due to its core customer, regardless of whatever is shown on the runway. Blazy's debut is a huge break away from that, so on top of being a well-loved designer, it brought a lot of eyes onto Chanel that wouldn't have cared about the brand's existence.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Forum Statistics

Threads
215,463
Messages
15,303,674
Members
89,475
Latest member
oldnewsreader
Back
Top