Tweed-looking leather is a given with him, people.
Innovation is deserved and needed at Chanel. Just essentials strategically art direction with some flair isn’t good enough: this is precisely why Anthony and his SL doesn’t get a pass: It’s so lazy, so inept, so passionless, despite the solid branding. Just recycling Yves’ archive but with the most minimum of effort in both design and construction for the lowest of common fashion denominators, and dressed up with admittedly solid presentations and campaigns, isn’t fooling anyone that’s faithful to the highest of standards. Anthony protesting logo doesn’t get a pass either, when bringing back the classic YSL logo actually saved the brand— and remains his only worthy contribution LMFAO …Mathieu on the other hand, has potential to produce a fresh, directional aesthetic with his artisanal concepts, and still investment-worthy beautiful garments, if he will just remember to dress a timeless, ladylike Chanel clientele, rather than some phantom modern fashion victim in giant pom poms and messy sloping shoulders. Which direction he chooses will decide whether Chanel will be a short-lived gimmick, or a glorious revival.
A fascinating and utterly impressive characteristic of Karl that often gets overlooked, is that he never bragged and boosted of the supremely unique technical achievements and advancements of his Chanel and Fendi. The brand of extensive technical research that was invested in the material and construction in these brands were always a byproduct of the overall garment— not at the expense. And as much as I’ve never been, and never will be a fan of Karl’s aesthetic, his offerings as separates were highly impressive, and highly versatile for his clientele: Each coat/jacket/dress was a testimony to its brand’s exclusive, premium quality of textile research, skilled construction and classic tailoring that could never be replicated at a lower price point. …The designs however, is a personal preference LOL
If Mathieu can appreciate, understand, and remember what made Karl’s Chanel such a distinct masterclass of a brand (…and being a distinct masterclass brand isn’t synonymous with visionary design…)— with the ability to still remain coveted 20-30 years later, while injecting his sensibilities to further pay tribute to whom came before him— and without allowing any ego to dominate, then Chanel could finally have the chance to be exciting again. Because just being a few step up from Virginie’s depressing hausfrau frumpy sewing class TEMU ripoffs isn’t enough to earn praise.
(Still preferred Hedi installed at Chanel. Eh.)