Matthieu Blazy - Designer, Creative Director of Chanel | Page 56 | the Fashion Spot

Matthieu Blazy - Designer, Creative Director of Chanel

The fact that Dior is outsourcing from India the embroideries for Haute-Couture level pieces is very eloquent of the lack of craftmanship in France.
It’s not actually. A lot more young people are applying to fo Metiers d’arts…And Artisanat in France goes from Bakery to jewelry to being a seamstress.
Dior outsourcing embroideries has more to do with costs.
With 19M, Chanel owns the whole chain of production. And the size of their production is huge enough to keep the ateliers busy all year between Couture and RTW (and RTW by Metiers d’Arts is produced in a smaller quanitity).
It’s expensive and producing in India allows them to be more competitive. But LVMH are working with independent Ateliers but I’m not sure the ateliers have the infrastructure to support a huge operation.
Because I know Schiaparelli also uses the Ateliers connected to LVMH and maybe sometimes things by Lemarié/Lessage

And the other reality is simple, the young people who wants to work on that side of the industry either wants to work in the Couture Ateliers but if they want to do embroideries or feathers, they wants to work only for 19M. For leather, they wants to work for Hermes.

The question of the Atelier doesn’t mean anything because those people are very capable. Many things can explain why the reproduction of the 1986 dress is not the same. You change the fabric and even if the fabric is close to the original, it can look a mess.


For JWA, I think it’s a question of weird design. Simple as that. It’s 3 dresses in one. The construction is great but a weird dress is a weird dress. The blue crepe is a great fabric and color. The back is horrendous. And maybe tulle instead of crillollin
 
Not directly related to Ayo Edebiri, who looks shy and endearing, or to Mathieu Blazy, whose degree of involvement in this is to me still ambiguous, but the decadence of French Couture as an art is unfortunately very evident these days.
Jerry Hall looks imperial in that gown from 1986, but I thought: maybe it is just the angle of the picture.
No. I was looking at more pictures and in all of them you can appreciate that the froncé of the bustier has a sense and a purpose, that it even creates smoothly a volume on the side, with the help of the fabric, and thanks to all of that you have a strong silhouette, different textures, precious details.

This red gown from Venice looks flat, frumpy, amateurish and uninteresting.
Ditto for Jonathan's dress from yesterday: unflattering, clumsy, hurried, unfinished.
Dior and Chanel used to be the nec plus ultra doing this and now they seem student projects.

The problem, I imagine, is only partially related to the artistic directors.
Raf was also this type of artsy intellectual designer and look at the Sterling Ruby dresses from his first Dior show. You could find them uneasy on the eye (or plain ugly) but their construction was spectacular.
So to me the problem affects the ateliers themselves, with traditions and savoir-faire slowly getting lost.

The fact that Dior is outsourcing from India the embroideries for Haute-Couture level pieces is very eloquent of the lack of craftmanship in France.
No, there is the craftmanship in France, Dior outsourcing in India is just a way of "elevating" cost-cutting, Chanel has a whole building with 10 of different ateliers, what we see here is lack of direction and couture or even sewing knowledge from the CDs, I bet some of them don't even know how and where their prototypes are made and by whom.
Also the facts that ateliers craftspeople cannot say "no" to a CD even if they knew full well that such or such fabric will not work for a specific construction. They can merely pinpoint small technicalities, it's the job of premières d'atelier to eventually suggest different constructions, fabrics or technics but CDs always have the last word.
Basically the only ones who can really perfect CDs ideas or sketches are Head of Couture, that's the reason why Balenciaga had to hire Copping to head their couture and perfect Demna's designs, and even if I don't like most of them, Balenciaga couture looks were impeccably thought-through and finished.
That's also the reason why I suggested Copping to join Dior or Chanel, instead of mid-Lanvin.
So imho there is no lack in craftmanship (see Schiaparelli, Balenciaga, Armani, the Lebanese coutures), there are lacks of sewing knowledge from JWA, MB, Lallo, Vacarello, they need to rely on and trust better heads of couture, even the craftspeople.

I also suspect those looks (the Dior on Alba and the Chanel on Abo, not the Tilda one) were last-minute rushed, 3, 4 weeks in the making maximum (they did not even steam them), instead of the usual 6-8-12 weeks minimum...
It's not a craftmanship issue, it's the management of this craftmanship. Dior and Chanel execs and PRs want so some sort of fast-couture, which proves they know nothing about couture, and that is a deadly sin for me.
Vuitton's customs looks for Emma Stones on the contrary seem "finished" and thought, the question if we like them or not is not a matter of couture but just a matter of taste.
 
I would also add that LVMH outsourcing in India is not only cost-cutting, it's a side-effect of "la guerre en dentelles": Chanel having bought Lemarié and Lesage for M19, LVMH is not served in priority, Lesage serves Chanel's orders first, then the smaller independant houses which are not Chanel competition and then Dior/LVMH/Kering/Hermès ... Hermès too outsource a lot of their embroideries in Nepal.
Cutting supplies to your competitors happens all the time, another example is Hermès and Kering monopolising the exotic skins, from the alligators farms to the specialised tanneries, they keep the 1st grade for themselves and sell the 2nd grade to competitors.
Thats the reason why Chanel stopped exotic skins, and Kering is keeping the 1st grade for Gucci and selling the surplus to Dolce & Gabbana for instance.
 
Last edited:
Also the facts that ateliers craftspeople cannot say "no" to a CD even if they knew full well that such or such fabric will not work for a specific construction.
AMEN!
Even if I would say that we have yet to see Blazy’s abilities in HC. I have not seen anything from him that suggest that he can’t direct an Atelier.

Lallo is uninspired but so far the construction is great.

I think in all fairness that designers in France and Italy always had an advantage because in most ateliers, they are still making clothes the old way, Couture way and then goes to the factory. That’s our classically trained.

What you said made me think about Karl who said that you would lose the respect of a premiere the moment she asks you a technical question.

And we have seen it with Virginie, her HC was always weird looking. Hard to imagine that the same atelier was producing wonders with Karl. At Dior, is more of the same people who worked under RAF and MGC and even JG.

I also think that fabrics are very very different no? Even the taffetas dresses by Virginie were looking a little bit cheap and I realized that it’s not a fabric that has been very favored by designers for years. I see a lot of shantung, mikado silk but not so much Taffetas.
 
AMEN!
Even if I would say that we have yet to see Blazy’s abilities in HC. I have not seen anything from him that suggest that he can’t direct an Atelier.

Lallo is uninspired but so far the construction is great.

I think in all fairness that designers in France and Italy always had an advantage because in most ateliers, they are still making clothes the old way, Couture way and then goes to the factory. That’s our classically trained.

What you said made me think about Karl who said that you would lose the respect of a premiere the moment she asks you a technical question.

And we have seen it with Virginie, her HC was always weird looking. Hard to imagine that the same atelier was producing wonders with Karl. At Dior, is more of the same people who worked under RAF and MGC and even JG.

I also think that fabrics are very very different no? Even the taffetas dresses by Virginie were looking a little bit cheap and I realized that it’s not a fabric that has been very favored by designers for years. I see a lot of shantung, mikado silk but not so much Taffetas.
Taffeta is a pretty weird fabric, because it's one of the easier silks to work technically with while its stiff, drape-resistant structure and shiny texture make it very tricky to make visually appealing. The shape needs to be very precise and crisp otherwise, it can easily give a very cheap, synthetic appearance if used improperly. Remember Dior FW17 with those dark blue (nearly black) taffeta dresses that were consistently compared to nylon/trash bags.
 
I really hope that isn't Blazy's. He's kind of our last hope after JWA womenswear previews.
his holiday is over!!!! lol even if this look has link to vintage chanel dress that is clearly better constructed and the caterging is by choice and design manipulated ...this new version it bares his (blazy´s ) signature of pretentious fromlesnes lol

even if the parachute fabric choice is different then the vintage version the choice to have it more messy and formels is by design and vision who ever was overseeing it.

the white suit is also badly made and the curves of the lapel are non existent flat compared to the vintage #KL version etc

it all looks cheaper made and designed
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
214,629
Messages
15,269,207
Members
88,738
Latest member
llu
Back
Top