And they look cooler (probably because of the shorter skirts and the pared down stylism).she is beautiful but the new chanel is giving 89,99 euro Mango, M&S
View attachment 1434209View attachment 1434210View attachment 1434211View attachment 1434212View attachment 1434213View attachment 1434214View attachment 1434215View attachment 1434216View attachment 1434217
Well put. The way people consume fashion is now also different. Before social media, it was the rich and well to do who purchased the latest and the greatest. People saw some pictures on newspaper, magazines, then online. The mass got inspired and purchased the original or the inspired products.
Now, the fashion houses give celebrities the clothes for free to create a mass marketing campaign, whether the clothes fit or not (because they are free, celebrities are probably not allowed to make alterations in most of the cases).
In other words, what was popular back then reflected the choices of taste markers (or high end consumers). Nowadays, it was a soviet style top-down approach: These are what we offer. They look great, so now you come and buy them.
F that.
p.s. you worked in fashion in a golden era.
It’s their store (Hirshleifers) it’s not in the Chanel store or flagship. You can chill.My goodness this is the corniest thing I have ever seen from a high fashion brand. I can't believe the brand selling 10k caviar timeless classic do CC logo christmas decorations. You don't see these tacky items at Hermès. Talking about elevation...
Because she has a great seamstress. This cut and the runway offerings have nothing in common.I like it. I like the cut, colour, and the way it has been styled.

That's fair. I wonder why this cut is not offered on the runway usually.Because she has a great seamstress. This cut and the runway offerings have nothing in common.
because the suit is from the 26P collection by blazy commercial stuff to be launched in store just before the show collection 26SBecause she has a great seamstress. This cut and the runway offerings have nothing in common.
