It really isn't so senseless that MDC would taker Coco off its top-50 list. The ppl there care about landing to campaigns and/or landing editorials in the top mags, i.e. America, French or Italian Vogue. It cares less about the other editions of Vogues and once you get to things like Turkey Vogue or Mexico Vogue, not at all. And the Elles, Marie Claires etc. of the world gets no points with MDC.
And you do have to admit that with the various the models who did Prada, Dior, Calvin Kein, Chanel, etc campaigns and landed on Vogue covers last year, Elle and Marie Claire really thinks Coco was THE top model during the past year?
No matter how much you love her, she simply was not the top model of 2010, no matter what metric you use.
So from that standpoint, Coco may do a lot of work but it's third-rate from MDC's viewpoint, even if it brings in money. That's why she's not on the top-50 list nor on the top icon list, whereas someone like Karen Elson or even Anna J. are on one list or the other. they may not be working as much as they once did, but they still land decent campaigns and editorial work.
And before anyone attacks me b/c they think I'm attacking Coco, I'm not. I'm completely disinterested in her and her career. And I think the MDC list is full of problems as well and there are certainly girls on the list whom I think don't deserve to be there and girls who should be but aren't. I'm just trying to offer my take on MDC's rationale specifically in the case of Coco.
And you do have to admit that with the various the models who did Prada, Dior, Calvin Kein, Chanel, etc campaigns and landed on Vogue covers last year, Elle and Marie Claire really thinks Coco was THE top model during the past year?
No matter how much you love her, she simply was not the top model of 2010, no matter what metric you use.
So from that standpoint, Coco may do a lot of work but it's third-rate from MDC's viewpoint, even if it brings in money. That's why she's not on the top-50 list nor on the top icon list, whereas someone like Karen Elson or even Anna J. are on one list or the other. they may not be working as much as they once did, but they still land decent campaigns and editorial work.
And before anyone attacks me b/c they think I'm attacking Coco, I'm not. I'm completely disinterested in her and her career. And I think the MDC list is full of problems as well and there are certainly girls on the list whom I think don't deserve to be there and girls who should be but aren't. I'm just trying to offer my take on MDC's rationale specifically in the case of Coco.


... so I'm really not sure. I just know her debut was @ 49 ... but remember she was just a new face back then, I think that was before she walked Chanel, Valentino, and other HF shows.... and of course waaay before VS.