tricotineacetat
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2005
- Messages
- 3,103
- Reaction score
- 3,997
Hmm… that is his choice and way of working to be at the helm of a house and to have no respect whatsoever to the previous CD and to aggressively changed everything into his own. And somewhat managing to find some links between the house’s codes and his. This is his strength and also his weakness.
And many criticised him for that because he did not give a f to the successful tenure of PP.
There is nothing wrong to have a smooth transition and to respect what he established at Celine.
Vaccarello did it and for years now it is easy to distinguish Slimane’s SL from Vaccarello’s SL.
However I dont like how the Celine campaigns by Sadli scream ‘shot by Slimane’s team’.
So 60% disagree, 40% agree. (Sorry in advance for any typo)
I would have wholeheartedly joined that sort of criticism, had he done this remake at a house like Jil Sander, succeeding Jil - Or for that matter, any other namesake designer with an identity solidified over decades, with the founder still very much alive.
Phoebe had a good run at Celine but she served among many other designers before her, totally remaking the brand to her taste much in the same way as Hedi did after her. It’s not her house so I trust LVMH was perfectly aware and in agreement for Hedi to come up with a very different take on Celine.
Michael Rider’s assignment now is to build on the branding and classical products introduced under Hedi while at the same time allowing him to pick whatever he feels makes sense from the Phoebe years he was a part of - We can see that in the monogram canvas of Hedi coming in new colors as well as the Triomphe emblem that featured heavily in Hedi’s Celine iconography to remain the key house logo.