Miuccia Prada - Designer, Co-Creative Director of Prada & Creative Director of Miu Miu

The collections are good and the logo is less obnoxious.
MiuMiu is retail gold too. Not shops filled with a bunch of black nylon items!

The irony is that I think the clothes themselves were better during the Katie Grand era but the collections were terribly styled and the brand was losing itself compared to the Rizzo days.

Now, the clothes are probably less exceptional, the same for the accessories but the styling is perfect!

And because branding is so important, suddenly, buying a simple polo shirt to recreate a look is not enough. The 890€ one seems necessary.

I think it’s really time for Miuccia to concentrate on MiuMiu but it also make the succession thing a bit more tricky.

I was thinking about Marni on how Consuelo’s daughter is finally the perfect heiress to her mother. Does Miuccia really have that?
We can all agree that Raf at Prada is a scary perspective.
 
it's not so surprising on the streets in East Asia since I see loads of Gen Z girls coveting the entire look - the shirt/mini skirt combo and the bag. the Gen Z girls really went for the entire look. I've seen the ensemble so many times that I knew it was doing well but the % news is a lot more than i thought.

one of the top malls where I am - the Miu Miu store upsized to where balenciaga used to be with a considerable focus on ready-to-wear. Balenciaga downsized...

I wonder if this sort of growth for them can be sustained, everyone is courting the Gen Z customer and i feel Miu Miu really captured them but imo, they are the worst demographic in my experience thus far since they are the most fickle...
 
Analysis on Miu Miu's supernatural growth:
Lessons from Miu Miu’s hot streak
Insiders and analysts break down what’s behind the brand’s rise after it posted an 89 per cent sales spike in the first quarter.

BY MADELEINE SCHULZ
APRIL 26, 2024


On Wednesday, Miu Miu reported stellar growth for the first quarter of 2024, with revenues up 89 per cent year-on-year — its biggest hike yet. The brand now makes up over a quarter of Prada Group’s revenues. The same day, the brand topped Lyst’s Q1 Index. It’s a breakout success story at a challenging time for fashion labels to cut through the noise. How long can it last?

Miu Miu’s high started in 2021 with its SS22 viral micro mini. At the time, experts wondered whether the skirt’s media appeal — on magazine covers and TikTok feeds — would translate to sales. Then its upward trajectory took off.

In 2023, Miu Miu’s revenues were up 58 per cent year-on-year (and its fourth-quarter revenues soared 82 per cent). And in 2022, revenues were up 20 per cent.

While 2021 kicked off Miu Miu’s growth period, the acceleration has come in the last couple of seasons, says Richard Johnson, chief commercial and sustainability officer at Mytheresa. It’s one of the retailer’s fastest-growing brands.

Can other brands learn from its success?

“One of the most important components of Miu Miu’s ‘moment in the sun’ is the home run success of its fashion,” says Luca Solca, senior analyst at Bernstein. Johnson agrees: “Miu Miu brings a positive injection of excitement and attitude, with an intellectual edge.”

So the clothes are good — but there’s more to it.

1. A youthful spirit sells
Miu Miu execs and Mrs Prada alike have emphasised Miu Miu’s focus on “youthful energy” in recent years — a rejection of the brand’s former ties to expressly young women. The brand’s AW24 casting hammered this home.

This is key to Miu Miu’s current success, says fashion commentator Tariro Makoni.

“They’re not thinking about the typified box of: ‘brunette, age 25 to 32, primarily shops at the Webster and went to [private school] Choate’. They’ve decoupled from the person, and are going for a youthful, creative energy.” This energy broadens Miu Miu’s customer base, she says, because it can apply to — and resonate with — anyone.

Solca notes that Miu Miu has hit a sweet spot “especially with young Chinese consumers”. K-Pop stars Momo, Wonyoung and Minnie are all Miu Miu ambassadors. It consistently dresses up-and-coming Chinese musicians and actors like Lexie Liu and Zhao Jinmai. The brand held its latest Women’s Tales film event in Shanghai last month.

“Consumption within APAC is known to move the needle,” Makoni says. “The star of the show is the APAC region.” Miu Miu’s acute awareness of — and active push in — this region is what’s really propelled the brand’s growth, she says.

2. Full looks sell individual pieces
Shoppers have grown used to full-look Miu Miu: a skirt set, overflowing bag, biker boot or, perhaps, the sold-out New Balance collab sneaker. Stylist Lotta Volkova is in part to thank. “Shoppers are inspired by Miu Miu’s distinctive styling,” says Katy Lubin, VP of brand and communications at Lyst.

Those that can afford to buy full looks are then more inclined to. “Customers are buying across the brand to create looks rather than focusing on individual items,” says Mytheresa’s Johnson.

But for those that can’t, Miu Miu’s styling makes people want to buy into the fantasy — even via a single item. The styling and cohesion facilitates the storytelling, Makoni says. “The overstuffed bag is a vignette that is portable to other brands and other things that you already have in your wardrobe. It’s less so about that item, and it's more about the energy and the vibe.”

Brands need to be mindful of this strategy, as it can feel detached from reality and forced if it’s not done right. Insisting on full head-to-toe looks has changed the nature of influencer relationships, and can make brands seem ‘pay to play’.

3. Micro-trends can work — when done right
Miu Miu has captured Gen Z in a way that many other luxury brands have not. “Prada has grown a lot in its ability to intercept young consumers online, through more effective use of influencers and social media,” Solca says.

The brand’s aesthetic lends itself to such trends, Makoni says.

“Miu Miu’s superpower is its youthfulness,” she adds. When Miu Miu experiments with looks from strappy flats (‘balletcore’) to preppy cardigans (‘librarian chic’) to pleated minis (‘corpcore’), consumers parse the looks as trends the brand is evoking and, often, leading. It feels authentic because the brand’s youthful identity is, by definition, “mutable and ephemeral”, as Makoni puts it. It also gets clicks.

4. Bolster trend with strategy
The same that holds for emerging brands is true of luxury houses: hype is great, but it won’t get you far without a solid business cushion behind the scenes.

Prada Group has been putting pillars in place in recent years to support Miu Miu’s growth, as part of the turnaround strategy cemented in 2017. Under this, Miu Miu has refined its communications strategy and product assortment (as above). CFO Andrea Bonini said the company’s investment in Miu Miu in past quarters is a growth-propeller — “including in organisation”.

Now-CEO Benedetta Petruzzo came on board in 2020, marking the brand’s first time with a Miu Miu-dedicated exec on board. As Prada CEO Andrea Guerra told investors: “In terms of Miu Miu, there is a group of people really working day and night, seven days a week.”

Can it last?
In short, no. But executives don’t expect it to.

“To imagine that we will continue to grow at this kind of rhythm is unrealistic. But on the other side, to achieve a proper position in this industry by Miu Miu, [is] a proper objective. Obviously, profitability grows more than proportionally,” Guerra said on Wednesday’s earnings call. He said that the company intends to “allow Miu Miu to have the proper space” for structural growth.

It’s not a guaranteed success, Solca flags. On whether Miu Miu can maintain momentum, he says: “This is difficult to assess. We have seen a few times that small brands rise to fame — think of Chloé, Givenchy, or Celine — and then they fade. Their success being transient.” (Which isn’t to say they can’t rise again, either. Just look at Chemena Kamali’s Chloé debut.)

There’s runway for growth, experts agree. At Miu Miu, to date, the clothes have been the stars. This is shifting, Guerra said on Wednesday’s call. “The brand is today much more balanced in terms of product categories compared to a year-ago only with a very correct and strong growth on leather goods.” It’s looking promising, says Mytheresa’s Johnson. “Customer interest is healthy across many categories, not isolated to ‘it’ items, so the future looks very sustainable.”
Source: Vogue Business
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Good for Miu Miu.

I think what has made these last few years so successful is that Miu Miu came up with a legitimate proposal for a way of dressing.

So much, if not most, of fashion these days is very “image only” based. Items are designed and styled in a way that seems only in the interest of existing within the confines of social media - this is true for almost everything we see during fashion week from the most outlandish to the most “wearable, quiet luxury” collections. It’s all meant for the screen. Everything is about “the look,” but rarely are you left with a feeling of wanting to adopt the style. It’s very masturbatory on the part of the designers.

Meanwhile, Miu Miu, with the help of Lotta, came up with something that feels real and applicable to reality without sacrificing the “viral factor.”

This is something that was a lot more common back in the late 90’s and early/mid 00’s. Designers, even at their most extravagant, seemed to always imbue their collections with a desirability factor that left you wanting to update your wardrobe. They never lost sight of their customer…even when they set out to challenge them.
 
^^cont.

It’s like those classic 00’s American Vogue “Runway to Reality” editorials. They illustrated perfectly that, at the core, designers had an idea about dressing.

I honestly can’t imagine how an editorial like that would work now because designers don’t think like that anymore, unfortunately.

But I do think Miu Miu captured that again, hence its success.
 
It's the way you can spot every single trend MiuMiu had in recent years all in the Spring/Summer 21' collection, which was such a pivotal moment for the brand and honestly, what made me become a fan.
 
Why are they buying Versace?

Prada moving closer to $1.6 billion deal for Versace, Bloomberg News reports​

By Reuters
March 3, 2025

March 2 (Reuters) - Italian luxury group Prada (1913.F), opens new tab is moving closer to a deal to buy Versace from upmarket fashion group Capri Holdings (CPRI.N), opens new tab after agreeing to a price of nearly 1.5 billion euros ($1.6 billion), Bloomberg News reported on Sunday.

Prada and Capri - also owner of brands including Jimmy Choo and Michael Kors - could finalise a deal for Versace in March, the report said, citing unnamed sources.
Talks between the two companies are progressing after initial due diligence did not show any risks, Bloomberg reported, adding that the timing and deal value could change and discussions could still fall apart.

Prada declined to comment, Capri did not immediately respond to a request for comment outside regular business hours.
Numerous fashion companies are potentially interested in buying Versace, Miuccia Prada, owner of the Italian luxury group that bears her name, said last week.
In February, Reuters reported exclusively that the Italian luxury group was given preferential access, ahead of other potential suitors, to the financial data of Versace, after Capri Holdings put it up for sale.

Capri Holdings bought Versace in 2018 for 1.83 billion euros including debt.
REUTERS
 
Versace is an interesting asset.
And it can be a good challenge too.

Prada developed the accessories at Alaia years ago and really found an identity for the brand.

That will be the biggest challenge too at Versace. Miuccia and Donatella are friends so I guess Donatella’s position will not be jeopardize for now.

Hopefully they learned from their mistakes with Jil Sander and Helmut Lang but they needs to get rid of Versace Jeans Couture for godsake!

For me Mayhoola was the best entity for Versace. But then it’s a matter of project more than pure ownership.
I mean i dont know much about these high level negotiations but do they truly feel like they can resurrect versace? One thing if OTB or Richemont or even Kering bought it but Prada...? a weird move
More Mayhoola…
Kering can’t afford to buy a brand now, even more a brand going through a turmoil.

Versace wouldn’t fit in OTB’s portfolio. I think the only kind of brand that Rosso would buy in that aesthetic would be Dsquared2 as they have a partnership through Staff International.

And Versace is already too big.

And Richemont…I mean. They should focus on the growth of Chloe and maybe do something with Dunhill.
 
Why are they buying Versace?


REUTERS
Wow, it is like a portfolio management 101 since Prada is exactly what the opposite of Versace is. Maybe they have leanred lessons from the Helmut Lang and Jil Sander deals to mitigate risks with this investment. It would be interesting to see how they will turn around Versace along with the possibility of Raf succeding Miuccia.
 
And JS, MARNI and MM are rather complementary no?
I don't know...maybe a long while ago but now, each one of them has shed the old skin and become something different, sometimes unrecognisable...
I want to see what happens with Prada and Versace, I'm curious. The fact that they're stylistically homogeneous does not have any importance, otherwise the acquisition of HL and JS would have been an automatic success, and it wasn't.
 
I am not sure I like Prada buying Versace, but it might be a surprise. I dislike LVMH, but maybe they could have handled it well as LVMH really deals in luxury fashion and that's where Versace needs to be. They could have finally hired Tisci, too. Alternatively I wish the owner of Schiaparelli and Tod's purchased it, hired a new design team, and let it build.

We will see. I just feel this could go bad.
 
Versace is an interesting asset.
And it can be a good challenge too.

Prada developed the accessories at Alaia years ago and really found an identity for the brand.

That will be the biggest challenge too at Versace. Miuccia and Donatella are friends so I guess Donatella’s position will not be jeopardize for now.

Hopefully they learned from their mistakes with Jil Sander and Helmut Lang but they needs to get rid of Versace Jeans Couture for godsake!

For me Mayhoola was the best entity for Versace. But then it’s a matter of project more than pure ownership.

More Mayhoola…
Kering can’t afford to buy a brand now, even more a brand going through a turmoil.

Versace wouldn’t fit in OTB’s portfolio. I think the only kind of brand that Rosso would buy in that aesthetic would be Dsquared2 as they have a partnership through Staff International.

And Versace is already too big.

And Richemont…I mean. They should focus on the growth of Chloe and maybe do something with Dunhill.
I see your point but i don't necessarily think that a brand should be bought by a conglomerate that has 'similar' brands in its portfolio, im being contradictive, i know lol
i think mayhoola can do great things to versace, but it would take time, its not only about money but also about good resources that can create something meaningful with the brand.
actually yes otb wouldnt invest in anything now. ... theyve enough enfant terribles in their portfolio they cant deal with obviously
i know the financial situation at kering is dire but an optimist in me believes that they could do something great with versace. as long as they dont turn it into hermes 2.0 like they did with bv under blazy mdr
actually thats interesting-why are richemont not actively investing in chloe? theyve gone very quiet

I don't know...maybe a long while ago but now, each one of them has shed the old skin and become something different, sometimes unrecognisable...

Unrecognizable and not in a good way at all. If Jill and Consuelo follow what's been done to their respective brands now, they're probably in utter disgust about it.
 
I see your point but i don't necessarily think that a brand should be bought by a conglomerate that has 'similar' brands in its portfolio, im being contradictive, i know lol
i think mayhoola can do great things to versace, but it would take time, its not only about money but also about good resources that can create something meaningful with the brand.
actually yes otb wouldnt invest in anything now. ... theyve enough enfant terribles in their portfolio they cant deal with obviously
i know the financial situation at kering is dire but an optimist in me believes that they could do something great with versace. as long as they dont turn it into hermes 2.0 like they did with bv under blazy mdr
actually thats interesting-why are richemont not actively investing in chloe? theyve gone very quiet
I don’t think a group should invest in brands in terms of aesthetic either but that seems to be what Renzo Rosso went for.
He could have bought a leather goods company and turn it into a cashcow but he went for relatively edgy fashion brands or at least highly respected fashion brands with a cult like following and relatively small at the time of their acquisition.

And he went for Fashion brands because he has his Staff International facilities.

Investing in a leather goods company also implies investing in the kind of facilities that would support that kind of business in a even bigger way.
The group is doing relatively well despite slow sales. If the ambition is to turn Margiela into a 1b brand, turn JS into a bigger brand and solidify Marni, they won’t be able to invest in Versace properly.

Versace requires a lot of investment because it’s still a quite fragile brand. In terms of image, distribution and everything.
Bottega Veneta was bought to be the Hermes of the Gucci Group so in a way, they never change the intention set by De Sole and Ford.

People at Kering doesn’t seem to know what they are doing right now so to acquire Versace for what…

The Richemont people never really took fashion as a serious matter. They are watchmaking/jewelry and Cartier is their cashcow. Those are more serious industry where the time is relatively long for the creative and where the marketing is operating in a more active way.

I guess they were fine as long as the sales were fine. They were surprised by the success of Alaia but they are catching up and investing heavily. It seems like the reception of the Chloe is encouraging them to invest more but with Richemont, the question is « are they going to maintain the pressure »?

I remember years ago, Alaia launched beauty. People expected a real expansion of Alaia and then one campaign, not so much push and it closed quietly.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
213,409
Messages
15,221,274
Members
87,291
Latest member
alo
Back
Top