Nicole Kidman

[madmagazine]

W.

 

[lele]

not sure if i like that of her.....

 

[tgp]

don't think I like it either-a little clownish which equals scary in my book.

 

[leyla m.]

i find her way too blaond for her complexion. and the fact that her eyebrows dont show doesnt help

 

[Episternum]

Ack! Not another Nicole Kidman cover!

 

[Girly Girl]

It is not a becoming picture of her at all. And the hair...... It will be interesting to see the pictures of her inside the magazine....

 

[Lena]

what is this

thanks for the preview madmagazine

 

[tealady]

blech!

 

[tealady]

That is the new look for Chanel No. 5?

 

[LolitaLuxe]

eeeeeeeek!

that style alone is quite frighting. If they would have incorporated a different wardrobe/styling/atmosphere/props, maybe it would look better.

 

[littlered]

She REALLY needs to go back to the red hair - the blond is just

 

[bee]

 

[Spacemiu]

its nto so abd, a bit fo a shock at first, but i liek that tehy did something diffrent for her

 

[Kimkhuu]

She doesn't look that bad . Although I think she looks far better with a bit redder hair colour.

 

[LavenderPineappleCitrus]

I agree...I am so sick of Nicole Kidman..how many more magazine covers does she need?!?!

 

[Erin]

Yikes...she looks like a porcelain doll, one of those with the scary excess amounts of red blush. Ugh.

 

[Deleted member 1957]

i think its not all that bad though i have this feeling it d have looked alot better on mariah carey!

 

[estevairevana]

Scary-playful. Very Karen Elson-ish. Her lightened brows make her forehead appear lower. A good take on her. Like a mime, like what is done with Karen Elson from time to time.

 

[Episternum]

So can anybody explain the fascination with Nicole Kidman? She's rich and skinny and spends a lot on clothes, but that doesn't make her an interesting or worthwhile person. I don't get it.

 

[moussemaker]

November US ELLE cover goes to Kirsten Dunst: http://www.***************/image/1015200311483.jpg