I just want to wait to hear all the facts. APparently the North Africans comment hasn't been neccesarily attributed to anyone, but was Oprah's groups explanation of the event. If the salesperson has indeed said that, then that OBVIOUSLY was wrong, and it was a racial thing.
But refusing entry to someone because the store is closed does not = racism in my mind. Stupid, if the person wanting entry is Oprah, but not racist.
If that remark was actually given by someone (which Hermes denies) then it was deffinitely racist. If that remark came about later, and was not something that anyone said but was just used as a possible explanation for why they would have refused entry to her, then it is just speculation.
I don't know which it is right now. There is video fotage which will at least show the timing and the mannerisms. I'd imagine if something racist was said, an immediate reaction will be seen, and the proper actions, such as firing or suing the individual should take place. BUT, since we have different explanations of events on both sides, I'm going to wait for something more objective before I base my own opinion (not that my own opinion would matter in the greater scheme of things). Calling a person, let alone a company racist is a big allegation, that should deffinitely be taken seriously, but also should be taken in light of evidence supporting it. Misunderstandings happen.
Not that I would ever shop in Hermes. Ha ha. I don't have the money for that world. So I'm certainly not trying to defend them, just offering a different way to look at the situation, and then standing back to see how the cards come out.
Really, is that such a horrible thing to do? People should avoid lynch mob mentalities.