Ok, so tights are not pants we know that. By now even Lindsay Lohan may know that...
Tights are to be worn under actual skirts and dresses and all that. Not as trousers, no "stand alone"...
But, as the pre-fall collections start showing up online, and the general mood has been moving away from the 80s to a more 70s 90s feel, could this be some sort of reverse trend? a backlash?
can pants be tights?
the black monochrome doesn't help of course, but those look like proper hemlines to me. as in straight-leg-trousers hemlines.
(all images are style.com)
at chanel. the camelia leggings, as the second pictures evidences, seem not to be leggings after all.
have your say: yay? nay?
ready for it? too early for a come back? late 90s early 00s anyone?
MOST IMPORTANTLY: any recent/more evidence?
(I couldn't find a thread on the topic)
Tights are to be worn under actual skirts and dresses and all that. Not as trousers, no "stand alone"...
But, as the pre-fall collections start showing up online, and the general mood has been moving away from the 80s to a more 70s 90s feel, could this be some sort of reverse trend? a backlash?
can pants be tights?
the black monochrome doesn't help of course, but those look like proper hemlines to me. as in straight-leg-trousers hemlines.
(all images are style.com)
at chanel. the camelia leggings, as the second pictures evidences, seem not to be leggings after all.
have your say: yay? nay?
ready for it? too early for a come back? late 90s early 00s anyone?
MOST IMPORTANTLY: any recent/more evidence?
(I couldn't find a thread on the topic)