velvetandsilk
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2020
- Messages
- 491
- Reaction score
- 945
The problem is that in the contemporary world, subtle elegance with fashion elements seem archaic to the average fashion consumer.
That's because high fashion was become entertainment used to market perfumes and bags, whereas two decades ago, all of those parts had equal ground.The problem is that in the contemporary world, subtle elegance with fashion elements seem archaic to the average fashion consumer.
That's because high fashion was become entertainment used to market perfumes and bags, whereas two decades ago, all of those parts had equal ground.
High fashion is now seen almost exclusively through a bidimensional audiovisual focused lens by most people
I don’t think Hedi ever mentioned being influenced by a designer…Maybe YSL even if it’s very obvious but I don’t recall. But when you look at his work at YSL and Dior Homme, you see a direct lineage. Nicolas, RAF and even Riccardo have referenced Helmut Lang and you the influence of his work in their aesthetic but it’s mixed with a lot of things.
What was interesting about was really the structure of the business beyond the aesthetic.
In terms of aesthetic there was that idea of extreme modernity, Hedi used to work on fabric development, the concept behind the music of the shows, stores that looked very modern and almost futuristic and this kind of almost break with the past. It was also the idea of the silhouette…
And when you look at the business of Dior Homme, it was build on jeans and sneakers.
Hedi’s real advantage was the name Dior. Because the name Dior evokes luxury. Helmut Lang is a brand that was IT at a time where there was still a kind of separation behind fashion and luxury. Only die-hard fans bought shoes and bags from Helmut Lang.
Bags and shoes are status symbols and people wanted to buy shoes and bags from quote on quote luxury brands. And that have been the problem for a lot of designers from the 80’s/90’s. If you think about it, Alaia is the only one of those « créateurs » who has acquired luxury status. It downsized so much that it became exclusive and therefore perceived as luxurious.
When you look at it, Montana, Mugler, Gaultier, Margiela and even Ferre and others never succeeded with accessories.
The name Dior added a touch of glamour to Hedi’s work. Progressive runway shows, intelligent merchandising, good quality and a quite fast expansion assured the success of Hedi. Suddenly there was a brand where men could wear head to toe silhouettes. Gucci under Tom Ford was very strong in menswear but it had a fashion approach that I don’t think a lot of men followed from to seasons to seasons (except for die-hard fans).
‘And in a way, it also worked with Balenciaga by Nicolas when they launched accessories because the idea of capsules was very similar to what Helmut did with his brand.
Balenciaga and Dior Homme were the brands that defined a certain idea of fashion for the 00’s. Tom Ford wasn’t there and the Prada look was very influential but didn’t defined a silhouette or a mood and so those disciples of Helmut Lang in a way became the voices. And men and women could wear those brands from Head to Toe without looking like label W***.
Which is ironic because today wearing Balenciaga and Dior Homme head to toe is the definition of a fashion victim.
I forgot about that...Not really though. Before fashion became conglomeratized, most brands made a huge majority of their revenue through licensing.
Bad licensing *cough* *ysl* *cough*
I forgot about that...
In my defence, they always like to erase that fact from the brand's history.
I don’t think Hedi ever mentioned being influenced by a designer…Maybe YSL even if it’s very obvious but I don’t recall. But when you look at his work at YSL and Dior Homme, you see a direct lineage. Nicolas, RAF and even Riccardo have referenced Helmut Lang and you the influence of his work in their aesthetic but it’s mixed with a lot of things.
What was interesting about was really the structure of the business beyond the aesthetic.
In terms of aesthetic there was that idea of extreme modernity, Hedi used to work on fabric development, the concept behind the music of the shows, stores that looked very modern and almost futuristic and this kind of almost break with the past. It was also the idea of the silhouette…
And when you look at the business of Dior Homme, it was build on jeans and sneakers.
Hedi’s real advantage was the name Dior. Because the name Dior evokes luxury. Helmut Lang is a brand that was IT at a time where there was still a kind of separation behind fashion and luxury. Only die-hard fans bought shoes and bags from Helmut Lang.
Bags and shoes are status symbols and people wanted to buy shoes and bags from quote on quote luxury brands. And that have been the problem for a lot of designers from the 80’s/90’s. If you think about it, Alaia is the only one of those « créateurs » who has acquired luxury status. It downsized so much that it became exclusive and therefore perceived as luxurious.
When you look at it, Montana, Mugler, Gaultier, Margiela and even Ferre and others never succeeded with accessories.
The name Dior added a touch of glamour to Hedi’s work. Progressive runway shows, intelligent merchandising, good quality and a quite fast expansion assured the success of Hedi. Suddenly there was a brand where men could wear head to toe silhouettes. Gucci under Tom Ford was very strong in menswear but it had a fashion approach that I don’t think a lot of men followed from to seasons to seasons (except for die-hard fans).
‘And in a way, it also worked with Balenciaga by Nicolas when they launched accessories because the idea of capsules was very similar to what Helmut did with his brand.
Balenciaga and Dior Homme were the brands that defined a certain idea of fashion for the 00’s. Tom Ford wasn’t there and the Prada look was very influential but didn’t defined a silhouette or a mood and so those disciples of Helmut Lang in a way became the voices. And men and women could wear those brands from Head to Toe without looking like label W***.
Which is ironic because today wearing Balenciaga and Dior Homme head to toe is the definition of a fashion victim.
Why do I feel like it would have been better the way around?
My best guess is that the suits at Helmut Lang probably want to keep the brand's "American-ness", when in truth, the brand was very Germanic/European.Absolutely, if they want people to care again about HL. Show it in Paris. You will be sure to have most of people to attend it and to be around the hottest brands.
Knowing Peter Do, he'll just add strings and ties everywhere to make it "original". He's a technician, but he has absolutely no imagination.I expect revamped archival pieces here. Nothing new.
What I suspect is that the suits are cheap and they are careful in the way they want to invest in that « New Helmut Lang ».My best guess is that the suits at Helmut Lang probably want to keep the brand's "American-ness", when in truth, the brand was very Germanic/European.
Since both cities are quite important to the brand, it would be interesting to alternate between the two. For example: Summer - Paris/Winter - New York. Balenciaga did that back in 2002/03.
As for Peter Do's eponymous label, showing in Paris isn't new for him. His first collections before the pandemic were shown via showrooms in Paris during the menswear shows as international buyers usually avoided New York. He'd planned on doing his first show in Paris, but the pandemic restrictions didn't allow it.
Was scrolling through Dylan Mehki's page and found this:
Helmut Lang RS22/23:
Peter Do SS23:
Dylan Mehki works as an assistant designer at Helmut Lang and will probably be working as Do's second-in-command, so this is very interesting to see.