Photoshop disasters #3 (Major magazines and brands only) | Page 8 | the Fashion Spot

Photoshop disasters #3 (Major magazines and brands only)

So Mango made a plus size line called Violeta. And the retouching... :blink:

VIOLETA_01_2014_09.jpg


VIOLETA_01_2014_06.jpg



VIOLETA_01_2014_03.jpg

The neck extension on this one is surreal.
[mango.com]
 
Nicole Kidman looks unrecognisable in the new Jimmy Choo campaign(had to do a double take to work out who the plastic/doll looking star of the campaign was)


screen capture windows
jimmy_choo_nicole_kidman_spring_campaign3.jpg




Fashion Gone Rogue
 
Now that is what you call a photoshop disaster. The 2nd shot especially is hideous.
 
So many things are wrong in that Beyonce cover, that's not her real waist, the hip-area looks

Have you seen her in IRL? I dont think that you can make accusations until you've seen her waist and her hips and they look exacly like the cover if not smaller/curvier. On the other hand, the fingers on her left hand are :lol:
 
:o:lol: OUCH! That leg twist looks, erm, painful!

And yes, Nicole looks virtually unrecognizable in those ads, esp the first shot. :blink:
 
shes either freakishly flexible or someone didnt do their job too well :rofl:
 
Not seen this one posted yet. But this makes Britney look horrible, nothing like her. Its from Lucky Magazine
Lucky-Magazine-Apologizes-for-Bad-Photoshop-Job-on-Britney-Spears-2.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
the left side of her face looks smaller than the right side (the left eye compared to the right) and the hair looks really odd too.
 
haha it looks like they photoshopped only one half of her
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
215,159
Messages
15,288,419
Members
89,051
Latest member
EX18
Back
Top