Prada S/S 2016 Milan

It won't be transparent in store tbh. Things like this don't make sense, but it changes how you think you can dress, ridiculously good or bad.


some pieces, jackets can be combined with the pieces from another Designers-collections. but ins this case must search some pieces looking for tailoring, colours, textile. Than shoes and bag. Is it too complicated in case of this collection.
This suit is transparent, maybe in store, in another light, it will be lloking as not transparent. This blue suit is terrible, also if it's Prada. Prada started to inspire her in the world of houswives years 50es-60es. Luxuruos Remakes of 70es were not enough .
 
Compared to other risky stuffs she did before, I find this collection just a rest. It's Prada, like people said previously, she does gimmicks all the time. Sorry but I just can't feel for your concern.
 
You should see the menswear collection, those shirts and sweaters are for the youngs day look; blazers just like Chanel tweeds to mix them with jeans, or if you go for more mature look, pencil skirts are good to match with; skirts will be adapted to office look. They all have their places to go. I don't find the absurdity.

that what i speaking about. Some pieces are looking interesting, for me the jackets are matching with.
But the "transparent" part of the collection i don't like at all.
Of course it is gimmick. Like her f/w 2015 collection ( which i like more that this one )
 
Came across this beautiful write-up in AnOther Mag's website by Jo-Ann Furniss:

Palimpsest: The Absence and Presence of Miuccia Prada

http://www.anothermag.com/fashion-beauty/7854/palimpsest-the-absence-and-presence-of-miuccia-prada

Miuccia Prada was not present at the showing of her Spring/Summer 16 womenswear collection in Milan – and yet her presence could be felt everywhere. It was a Prada collection and show par excellence – both strangely familiar yet strangely strange. In OMA’s floating set, suspended sheets of curved and corrugated fibre glass and plastic were a ghostly mimic for a rougher, metal, real world version of events. So too were the clothes, where the bourgeois tweed suit became almost a delicate apparition, reworked in transparencies, sometimes intercut with aprons of original, traditional tweed. Then time would almost be literally sliced, in clothing made from strips of fabric in patent leather, fur, or the finest couture fabrics. Were these 20s Art Deco stripes? 60s youthquake signifiers? Signs of the sportswear of now? Or was this simply something of the future built on the many iterations of the past?

What was taking place in fact seemed to be a rushing together of the past, present and future, an almost autobiographical overview from the person of Miuccia Prada – who was herself both there and not there (a personal emergency meant that she wasn't physically present at the show). Her long-term collaborator Frederic Sanchez’s auditory accompaniment was composed of ghostly snatches and layers of jazz, which he defined as “A disorientation of time, where your head is full of memories – fragments of a life.” The stylist of the show, Olivier Rizzo, described “Miuccia’s life as an eccentric clash of culture and knowledge. Where there are so many years of her looking at the world and of her being in the world.” The show’s hairstylist, Guido Palau, created hair that purposely traversed the lines of kiss-curled flapper, skin girl rebel and ‘baby-fringed’ scally girl, “There is an idea of tricking the eye – it could be seen as nostalgic but it isn’t," he explained. "There is always something else at work, something strange. Miuccia is always looking for the ‘tipping point’ – something slightly uncomfortable and unconventional. She has no fear in challenging people’s perceptions of beauty.” For Fabio Zambernardi, Miuccia Prada’s design director, “There were so many layers of information, but Miuccia ultimately thought it should be beautiful and chic. We simply wanted to do something chic for a Prada woman with experience and knowledge who likes beautiful clothes. That’s why Miuccia became obsessed with suits. Of course she gets bored of suits in a second! But that is why they also became an obsession for her.”

Prada perfection: Even when it's wrong, it must be absolutely right
“’Who is this woman who wears a suit? Is it too old? Is it wrong?’ Very often she likes to hate things. She hates things so much it suddenly becomes what she likes!” So says Fabio Zambernardi, of Miuccia Prada’s spin on the Socratic Method that is her design process. In the world of Prada, perfection is paramount, but this is a perfection that is not easily won: even wrongness has to be absolutely right.

“The sensibility, knowledge and knowhow at Prada – a creative, sensitive and emotional combination – is like nowhere else,” says Olivier Rizzo. “To work for somebody so incredible, so legendary and larger than life as Mrs Prada, together with the wonderful Fabio Zambernardi – it’s like heaven. With the fashion show you are constantly challenged in a good way; every fibre of your being is challenged creatively, emotionally and mentally. You question yourself so much and Miuccia Prada encourages rebellion as a state of mind – she is constantly questioning and challenging herself, she sets the example. It is her detail, thinking process and freedom that opens up everything, that looks at and creates all the possibilities. Everything has to gel for a show, everything – and the openness of mind and courage it takes for her thought and word process blows my mind.”

Of course, Miuccia Prada knew every finite detail and process of her latest show and collection – she was there until its ultimate completion. But perhaps where her spirit was most present was in the rebellious, chic, wrongness of it all – the sort of wrongness that only Miuccia Prada as a designer can make seem absolutely right, and right now. The figure of Tutankhamen and the 20s Egyptian revival could be found in those coats made of strips of gilded python and delicate suede, as well as in make-up artist Pat McGrath’s gold lips; the ghostly versions of 90s Prada past, made transparent in brown and orange stripes; the fabric veils draped across the models' chests, original fabrics from the 20s, unique and rare with a finite supply fully utilised for the show; the purposely plodding knits and prints layered underneath and throwing everything off… “When I was eight years old my grandmother decided to make me a sweater and asked me to choose the colours,” says Fabio Zambernardi. “I was very excited, so excited I actually could not choose… In the end I chose brown and yellow! As a kid Miuccia was also attracted to things that were so horrible and ugly, colours so wrong they become right.”

In the latest collection such wrongness of colouration was everywhere present, but particularly in the home-style domesticity of the knitted sweaters layered under elegant flapper dresses, or the ornately embroidered suiting of the finale. A touch of childlike domestic glee that could also be found in the key print of the show, again layered under elegant suiting or dresses, yet looking like a child’s bedspread or wallpaper. Here the details are a race car, a rabbit and a rocket – Miuccia Prada’s eldest son is a race car driver, the rabbit is for luck and the rocket for the future. Such autobiographical signs and symbols of Miuccia Prada can be found everywhere in the collection, as they can be in all of Pradaland – including one of its newest attractions: Fondazione Prada.
 
There's this net dickey here which the blogger calls it "vilette jabot." What does vilette mean here?
28u787b.jpg

hey-woman.com
 
^^
Isn't it more "Voilette Jabot"? Like a "modern" take on a jabot collar?
 
I never heard of this Zambernardi...is there a proper source where I could find info such as this? The stylist for the shows, design director. Always wanted to know who was really designing Prada

Btw beautiful photos posted here of the show.
 
^Thanks:Pink: Yeah I tried to use BoF. It doesn't have a lot or go into detail
Sometimes Wikipedia has more info, like on Dior and its designers.
Will keep on the lookout...
 
^Thanks:Pink: Yeah I tried to use BoF. It doesn't have a lot or go into detail
Sometimes Wikipedia has more info, like on Dior and its designers.
Will keep on the lookout...

There's an article about him and his work for a production of the opera "Don Giovanni" on Love #11 S/S 2014. It was posted on the issue's thread.
 
I'm obsessed with this collection. It's so ugly that I f*cking love it. I'd wear every single look.

I agree. In fact, in hindsight, it seems to me it's the last "statement" collection Miuccia ever did in the last few years, at least compared to what came after. It's kind of Miuccia meets Coco on Acid. Brilliant.
 
A decent collection destroyed by a very pretentious styling. I really don't like this layering thing.
I love the lightness of everything.
Going through this thread since it popped up again...

I recall not caring deeply for this collection when it came out...but Lola is correct.

It’s actually a pretty good collection, but casting, styling and hair/makeup really dragged this all down.

The clothes themselves are quite good. I absolutely love the mustard/white/black/brown stripes...especially when they are patchworked together from patent leather and suede - creating that really gorgeous hyper-shine and hyper-matte contrast. It’s so tactile and delicious. The white organza floral car coats at the end are the weak spot because they don’t seem to have any correlation with the rest of the collection.

So yes - indeed...had these same clothes been stripped of the net dickies, the bobble earrings, the stupid gold lips and gelled hair...and certainly been cast on better models...this could have been a much stronger and more memorable showing from Miuccia.

This one was definitely one of the very last, if not THE last Prada collection that had any semblance of what Prada WAS, and even at that, it carried with it whiffs and omens of the cheesy gimmicks the brand has now been reduced to.
 
Going through this thread since it popped up again...

I recall not caring deeply for this collection when it came out...but Lola is correct.

It’s actually a pretty good collection, but casting, styling and hair/makeup really dragged this all down.

The clothes themselves are quite good. I absolutely love the mustard/white/black/brown stripes...especially when they are patchworked together from patent leather and suede - creating that really gorgeous hyper-shine and hyper-matte contrast. It’s so tactile and delicious. The white organza floral car coats at the end are the weak spot because they don’t seem to have any correlation with the rest of the collection.

So yes - indeed...had these same clothes been stripped of the net dickies, the bobble earrings, the stupid gold lips and gelled hair...and certainly been cast on better models...this could have been a much stronger and more memorable showing from Miuccia.

This one was definitely one of the very last, if not THE last Prada collection that had any semblance of what Prada WAS, and even at that, it carried with it whiffs and omens of the cheesy gimmicks the brand has now been reduced to.

It was also around that time that the brand lost it luster. It wasn’t the easiest collection tbh. The kitten heels were cute and the shapes fine but those prints...
The resort offered more possibilities but still...
It was also around that time that their financial difficulties became known and their business model became more and more obsolete.

I really loved Spring 2018. For me it’s still a great collection. It’s maybe her most underrated and under appreciated collection because the mangas thing was too obvious in the « trying to recreate a hit », but it’s really the only recent Prada collection I had bought a lot of pieces from. A lot of that collection was on sale a bit everywhere surprisingly.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
211,999
Messages
15,169,332
Members
85,826
Latest member
hosewearer
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "058526dd2635cb6818386bfd373b82a4"
<-- Admiral -->